首页> 外文期刊>Energy economics >Cross-border effects of capacity mechanisms: Do uncoordinated market design changes contradict the goals of the European market integration?
【24h】

Cross-border effects of capacity mechanisms: Do uncoordinated market design changes contradict the goals of the European market integration?

机译:能力机制的跨境影响:不协调的市场设计变更是否与欧洲市场整合的目标相矛盾?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper analyses cross-border effects of a strategic reserve (SR) and reliability options (ROs) based on a two-country simulation model. Using a game-theoretic approach, the countries' policy options for capacity remuneration mechanisms (CRMs) are analysed with respect to welfare and distribution effects. An SR tends to narrow down the market, while ROs intensify price competition. However, cross-border effects are most likely negative for consumers and producers in total in the case of a unilateral implementation of a CRM, and market design changes should be coordinated.
机译:本文基于两国模拟模型,分析了战略储备(SR)和可靠性选项(RO)的跨境影响。使用博弈论方法,从福利和分配效应的角度分析了各国针对能力报酬机制(CRM)的政策选择。 SR往往会缩小市场范围,而RO则会加剧价格竞争。但是,在单方面实施CRM的情况下,跨境影响对消费者和生产者总体而言很可能是负面的,因此应协调市场设计变更。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号