...
首页> 外文期刊>Energy economics >An empirical model comparison for valuing crack spread options
【24h】

An empirical model comparison for valuing crack spread options

机译:评估裂纹扩展选项的经验模型比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this paper, we investigate the pricing of crack spread options. Particular emphasis is placed on the question of whether univariate modeling of the crack spread or explicit modeling of the two underlyings is preferable. Therefore, we contrast a bivariate GARCH volatility model for cointegrated underlyings with the alternative of modeling the crack spread directly. Conducting an empirical analysis of crude oil/heating oil and crude oil/gasoline crack spread options traded on the New York Mercantile Exchange, the more simplistic univariate approach is found to be superior with respect to option pricing performance. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:在本文中,我们研究了价差期权的定价。特别强调的是裂纹扩展的单变量建模还是两个基础的显式建模是更可取的问题。因此,我们对比了共模基础的双变量GARCH波动率模型和直接建模裂纹扩展的替代方法。对纽约商品交易所交易的原油/取暖油和原油/汽油裂解价差期权进行实证分析,发现更简单的单变量方法在期权定价方面更具优势。 (C)2015 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号