...
首页> 外文期刊>Energy Conversion & Management >Optimal schemes and benefits of recovering waste heat from data center for district heating by CO_2 transcritical heat pumps
【24h】

Optimal schemes and benefits of recovering waste heat from data center for district heating by CO_2 transcritical heat pumps

机译:通过CO_2跨临界热泵从地区加热数据中心回收废热的最佳方案和益处

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Recovering waste heat from data center (DC) for district heating by CO2 transcritical heat pumps can effectively improve the performance of DC and reduce CO2 emission of district heating. However, the optimal design schemes, financial and environmental benefits, and market competitiveness of waste heat heating system are still unclear for different application scenarios. To realize the optimal system design and evaluate the benefits at different application scenarios, this work analyzed and compared the comprehensive performance of four system design schemes, considering two waste heat recovery locations and two cycle types. The maximum coefficient of performance (COP) was set as the optimization goal. Influences of electricity and heat prices on the optimal scheme and thermo-economic performance of waste heat heating system were analyzed. The direct electric-heating, coal-heating, gas-heating, air source heat pump, and ground source heat pump were selected as the comparative heating methods to evaluate the market competitiveness of waste heat heating system. Results show that using waste heat of cooling water from IT room achieves a better thermo-economic performance than that from chillers, which increases maximum COP by 18.2%-28.9% and reduces system investment cost by 4.2%-10.2%. The COP of IHE cycle (e.g., add an internal heat exchanger in the simple cycle) is larger, whereas the simple cycle has a lower investment cost. The cycle type with the shortest dynamic payback period depends on actual electricity and heat prices. The financial and environmental benefits of waste heat heating system are very attractive since it can reduce energy cost by 23.0%-75.0% compared with common heating methods and reduce CO2 emission by 12,880 tons annually compared with gas-heating. Furthermore, the energy efficiency of DC will be improved by waste heat reuse, and the annual energy reuse effectiveness (ERE) can decrease from 1.296 to 0.902 at the annual heating time of 121 days.
机译:通过CO2跨临界热泵回收来自数据中心(DC)的废热,可以有效地提高DC的性能,减少了区供暖的二氧化碳排放。然而,对于不同的应用场景,最佳设计方案,金融和环境效益以及废热加热系统的市场竞争力仍然不清楚。为了实现最佳系统设计和评估不同应用场景的好处,分析并比较了四种系统设计方案的综合性能,考虑了两个废热恢复位置和两个循环类型。最大的性能系数(COP)被设定为优化目标。分析了电力和热价对废热加热系统最佳方案和热经济性能的影响。选择直接电加热,加热,气体加热,空气源热泵和地源热泵作为评估废热加热系统的市场竞争力的比较加热方法。结果表明,使用IT室的冷却水的废热达到更好的热经济性能,而不是冷却器,这增加了最高警察的18.2%-28.9%,并降低了系统投资成本4.2%-10.2%。 IHE循环的COP(例如,在简单的循环中加入内部热交换器)较大,而简单的循环具有较低的投资成本。具有最短动态投资回收期的循环类型取决于实际电力和热价。废热加热系统的金融和环境效益非常有吸引力,因为它可以将能源成本降低23.0%-75.0%,而与普通的加热方法相比,每年将CO2排放减少12,880吨,与气体加热相比。此外,DC的能量效率将通过废热再利用提高,年能重用效率(ERE)可以在121天的年加热时间下从1.296降至0.902。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Energy Conversion & Management》 |2021年第10期|114591.1-114591.16|共16页
  • 作者单位

    Tsinghua Univ Key Lab Thermal Sci & Power Engn MOE Key Lab CO2 Utilizat & Reduct Technol Beijing 100084 Peoples R China;

    Tsinghua Univ Key Lab Thermal Sci & Power Engn MOE Key Lab CO2 Utilizat & Reduct Technol Beijing 100084 Peoples R China;

    Malardalen Univ Sch Business Soc & Engn Vasteras Sweden;

    Tsinghua Univ Key Lab Thermal Sci & Power Engn MOE Key Lab CO2 Utilizat & Reduct Technol Beijing 100084 Peoples R China;

    Tsinghua Univ Key Lab Thermal Sci & Power Engn MOE Key Lab CO2 Utilizat & Reduct Technol Beijing 100084 Peoples R China;

    Malardalen Univ Sch Business Soc & Engn Vasteras Sweden;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Data center; Waste heat; Heat pump; Carbon dioxide; District heating; Financial benefit;

    机译:数据中心;废热;热泵;二氧化碳;区供暖;经济利益;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号