首页> 外文期刊>Energy Conversion & Management >Techno-economic assessment of solar thermal and alternative energy integration in supercritical water gasification of microalgae
【24h】

Techno-economic assessment of solar thermal and alternative energy integration in supercritical water gasification of microalgae

机译:微藻超临界水域太阳能热替代能源集成的技术经济评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Supercritical water gasification (SCWG) as a pathway for biofuel production, presents an attractive option for processing assorted biomass feedstock due to its ability to process wet feedstock with higher hydrogen yield. However, SCWG requires significant thermal energy input to reach its high operating temperatures leading to overall process inefficiency. Although previous studies have found microalgae-based SCWG process to be uneconomic, investigations on the choice of energy integration and process-energy configuration options to make the process economically viable has not been considered. As such, this work focused on the economic viability of integrating energy alternatives such as solar thermal options (solar tower and parabolic trough collector), natural gas (NG), and electricity in a microalgae-based SCWG fuel plant. The syngas fuel plant of 19,000 t/y was modelled in Aspen Plus using nine different energy configurations of solar and conventional energy. The economic results of the energy integrations delivered minimum fuel selling prices (MFSPs) of 52-73 AUD/GJ. The most economic options for supplying energy to the plant were shown to be NG alone or using solar parabolic trough combined with supplementary NG to further boost the feedstock temperature in the SCWG reactor. The annual variable operational cost was found to contribute 77% towards MFSP and was highly dependent on the price of microalgae and hydrogen. At higher capital cost, MFSP was affected by the discount rate and the cost of energy which are susceptible to the cost of solar energy infrastructure or price of conventional energy. Sensitivity and switch value analysis showed that natural gas and parabolic trough-natural gas energy integrations could deliver lower MFSP at considerable reductions in annual operational cost and the solar energy components of the annual capital cost. The choice of energy option and process-energy configuration was demonstrated to play a significant role in making SCWG process economical. While solar tower technology may not be viable for high temperature process plant energy utilization, combining solar parabolic trough with natural gas was determined to be a more promising outcome for lower energy cost. Higher prices of conventional energy, carbon tax credit and government policies could make the SCWG technology with algae feedstock economically viable and 100% renewable in the future.commentSuperscript/Subscript Available/comment
机译:超临界水气化(SCWG)作为生物燃料生产的途径,由于其处理具有较高氢产率的湿原料的能力,因此提供了一种有吸引力的选择各种生物质原料。然而,SCWG需要显着的热能输入,以达到其高效温度,导致整体过程低效率。尽管以前的研究发现基于微藻的SCWG过程是不经济的,但对能量集成和过程 - 能源配置选项的选择来使过程尚未考虑经济上可行的过程。因此,这项工作侧重于将能源替代品(如太阳能塔和抛物线槽收集器),天然气(NG)和基于微藻基SCWG燃料厂的电力集成的经济可行性。 19,000吨/ y的合成气燃料厂在Aspen Plus中使用九种不同的太阳能和传统能量进行了建模。能源集成的经济结果提供了52-73澳元/ GJ的最低燃料销售价格(MFSP)。为植物供应能量的最经济选择被证明是单独的,或者使用太阳抛抛槽与补充NG联合,以进一步提高SCWG反应器中的原料温度。发现年度变量运营成本为MFSP贡献77%,高度依赖于微藻和氢的价格。以较高的资本成本,MFSP受折扣率的影响和能源成本,易受太阳能基础设施成本或传统能源价格的成本影响。敏感性和开关值分析表明,天然气和抛物面槽 - 天然气能量集成可以在年度业务成本和年度资本成本的太阳能组件下实现较低的MFSP。能够选择能量选择和过程 - 能量配置在使SCWG过程经济学中起着重要作用。虽然太阳能塔技术对于高温过程厂能源利用可能不可行,但是将太阳抛抛抛槽与天然气相结合,确定了较低能源成本的更有前途的结果。常规能源,碳税收抵免和政府政策价格的高价格可以使SCWG技术与藻类原料经济上可行,未来可持续100%。<注释>上标/下标可用

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号