...
首页> 外文期刊>Energy Conversion & Management >A techno-economic-environmental study evaluating the potential of oxygen-steam biomass gasification for the generation of value-added products
【24h】

A techno-economic-environmental study evaluating the potential of oxygen-steam biomass gasification for the generation of value-added products

机译:一项技术经济环境研究,评估了氧气蒸汽生物质气化在增值产品生产中的潜力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The production of renewable chemicals and fuels is driving modern society towards a type of sustainable development which involves a decreasing dependency on fossil fuels and the minimisation of waste. Biomass, a waste by-product from the urban environment, is a carbon dioxide neutral organic fuel that can potentially serve as a feedstock for the production of sustainable power and heat. Gasification is preferred over the other thermal conversion options for biomass processing whereby the product synthesis gas can be utilised to power generators/turbines and generate clean energy, ammonia and methanol. Incidentally, efficient and economically sound biomass driven supply chains can be integrated into an existing petrochemical infrastructure. Moreover, the potential production volumes of fuels and green chemicals can also be increased by the addition of multiple biomass sources, thereby creating potential positive scale effects. This study proposes a new poly-generation process that utilises multiple sources of biomass feedstock to produce high quality urea, methanol, Fisher-Tropsch liquids and power. Four flowsheet configurations are simulated using Aspen Plus software and the builtin capabilities of the activated analysis using Aspen Process Economic Analyzer and Aspen Energy Analyzer to perform the economic, energy and environmental impact calculations. The results demonstrate that the methanol production technique is the most economic process pathway with a net profit of approximately $0.035 per kg of biomass input, whilst the urea process pathway presents the lowest environmental impact solution with approximately 0.71 kg of CO2-e per kg of biomass input. These results are relative and can be analysed from different perspectives based on the market demand of the products and their applications and local need. For instance, considering at the economic and environmental indicators relative to the production capacity, production of liquid fuels achieve net profits of approximately $0.27 per kg of product, whilst urea production demonstrates the lowest environmental emissions of approximately 3.93 kg of CO2-e per kg of product.
机译:可再生化学品和燃料的生产正在推动现代社会朝着一种可持续发展的方向发展,这种可持续发展涉及对化石燃料的依赖性不断降低以及废物的减少。生物质是城市环境中产生的废物,是一种二氧化碳中性有机燃料,可以潜在地用作生产可持续电力和热能的原料。对于生物质处理而言,相比于其他热转化选择而言,优选气化,由此可以将产物合成气用于发电机/涡轮机,并产生清洁能源,氨和甲醇。顺便说一句,可以将有效且经济上合理的生物质驱动的供应链整合到现有的石化基础设施中。此外,还可通过添加多种生物质资源来增加燃料和绿色化学品的潜在产量,从而产生潜在的积极规模效应。这项研究提出了一种新的多联产工艺,该工艺利用多种生物质原料来源生产高质量的尿素,甲醇,费托液体和电力。使用Aspen Plus软件模拟了四种流程图配置,并使用Aspen Process Economic Analyzer和Aspen Energy Analyzer进行了激活分析的内置功能,以执行经济,能源和环境影响计算。结果表明,甲醇生产技术是最经济的工艺路线,每千克生物质输入的纯利润约为0.035美元,而尿素工艺路线是对环境影响最低的解决方案,每千克生物质约有0.71千克CO2-e输入。这些结果是相对的,可以根据产品的市场需求及其应用和本地需求从不同角度进行分析。例如,考虑到与生产能力相关的经济和环境指标,液体燃料的生产可实现每千克产品约0.27美元的净利润,而尿素生产显示出的最低环境排放量约为每千克产品3.93千克二氧化碳当量。产品。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号