首页> 外文期刊>Energy and Buildings >Variable refrigerant flow systems: A review
【24h】

Variable refrigerant flow systems: A review

机译:可变制冷剂流量系统:综述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This review study presents a detailed overview of the configurations of the outdoor and indoor units of a multi-split variable refrigerant flow (VRF) system, and its operations, applications, marketing and cost. Besides, a detailed review about the experimental and numerical studies associated with the VRF systems is provided. The aim is to put together all the diversified information about the VRF systems in a single source. According to detailed review, it is observed that the compressor frequency and the electronic expansion valve opening should be controlled simultaneously for the control strategies, and it is concluded that VRF system not only consumes less energy than the common air conditioning systems such as variable air volume, fan-coil plus fresh air under the same conditions, but also provides better indoor thermal comfort as long as it is operated in the individual control mode. It is found that even though the main drawback of the VRF system is the high initial cost compared to the common air conditioning systems, due to the energy saving potential of the VRF system, the estimated payback period of the VRF system compared to an air cooled chiller system in a generic commercial building could be about 1.5 year.
机译:这篇综述研究详细介绍了多分裂可变制冷剂流量(VRF)系统的室外和室内单元的配置,及其运行,应用,市场营销和成本。此外,提供了有关与VRF系统相关的实验和数值研究的详细评论。目的是将有关VRF系统的所有多样化信息汇总到一个来源中。通过详细审查,可以发现,对于控制策略,应同时控制压缩机频率和电子膨胀阀开度,并得出结论,VRF系统不仅消耗比普通空调系统更少的能量,例如可变风量。 ,风机盘管和相同条件下的新鲜空气,但只要在单独的控制模式下运行,也可提供更好的室内热舒适性。已发现,尽管VRF系统的主要缺点是与普通空调系统相比初始成本较高,但由于VRF系统具有节能潜力,因此与空气冷却系统相比,VRF系统的预计投资回收期通用商业建筑中的冷水机系统可能需要1.5年左右的时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号