首页> 外文期刊>Energy and Buildings >Simplified calculation method for design cooling loads in underfloor air distribution (UFAD) systems
【24h】

Simplified calculation method for design cooling loads in underfloor air distribution (UFAD) systems

机译:地板下空气分配(UFAD)系统中设计冷却负荷的简化计算方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper describes the development of a simplified calculation method for design cooling loads in underfloor air distribution (UFAD) systems. The simplified design tool is able to account for key differences between UFAD and traditional mixing overhead (OH) systems. These include: (1) difference between design day cooling load profiles, (2) impact of a thermally stratified environment for UFAD versus well-mixed for OH, and (3) impact of heat transfer (temperature gain) in underfloor air supply plenums. The new design tool allows the use of a familiar load calculation procedure for OH mixing systems as input to the UFAD design tool. Based on 87 EnergyPlus simulations, four regression models have been developed to transform the OH cooling load into the UFAD cooling load, and then to split this total load between the supply plenum, zone (room), and return plenum. The regression models mainly depend on floor level, and position (interior or perimeter) and orientation of the zone under analysis. Although considered in the analysis, supply air temperature, window-to-wall ratio, internal heat gain, plenum configuration, climate, presence of the carpet and structure type do not strongly influence the developed models. The results show that, generally, UFAD has a peak cooling load 19% higher than an overhead cooling load and 22% and 37% of the total zone UFAD cooling load goes to the supply plenum in the perimeter and interior, respectively.
机译:本文介绍了一种用于地板下空气分配(UFAD)系统中设计冷却负荷的简化计算方法的开发。简化的设计工具能够解决UFAD与传统混合开销(OH)系统之间的关键差异。这些因素包括:(1)设计日冷却负荷曲线之间的差异;(2)UFAD的热分层环境的影响与OH的充分混合的影响;以及(3)地板下气室的传热(温度增益)的影响。新的设计工具允许对OH混合系统使用熟悉的载荷计算程序作为UFAD设计工具的输入。基于87个EnergyPlus仿真,已开发了四个回归模型,以将OH冷却负荷转换为UFAD冷却负荷,然后将该总负荷分配到供气室,区域(房间)和回气室之间。回归模型主要取决于地板高度,分析区域的位置(内部或周边)和方向。尽管在分析中已考虑到,但送风温度,窗墙比,内部热增益,通风系统配置,气候,地毯的存在和结构类型不会严重影响已开发的模型。结果表明,通常,UFAD的峰值冷却负荷比顶部冷却负荷高19%,总区域的UFAD冷却负荷的22%和37%分别流向外围和内部的供气室。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Energy and Buildings》 |2011年第3期|p.517-528|共12页
  • 作者单位

    Center for the Built Environment, University of California, 390 Wurster Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720-1839, USA;

    Center for the Built Environment, University of California, 390 Wurster Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720-1839, USA;

    Center for the Built Environment, University of California, 390 Wurster Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720-1839, USA;

    Center for the Built Environment, University of California, 390 Wurster Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720-1839, USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    underfloor air distribution (ufad); cooling load; hvac sizing; overhead air distribution (oh); mixing ventilation;

    机译:地板下空气分配(ufad);制冷负荷;暖通空调尺寸;高架空气分配(oh);混合通风;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号