首页> 外文期刊>Energy and Buildings >A comparative study of district and individual energy systems providing electrical-based heating, cooling, and domestic hot water to a low-energy use residential community
【24h】

A comparative study of district and individual energy systems providing electrical-based heating, cooling, and domestic hot water to a low-energy use residential community

机译:对低能耗住宅社区提供基于电气的供暖,制冷和生活热水的区域和个人能源系统的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study analyzes potential benefits of centralized systems providing space conditioning and domestic hot water to a small community of electric-only low-energy use dwellings in Northern California. Benefits are analyzed in terms of levelized cost and site energy use. Two district-based scenarios, served by a central ground source heat pump and a central electric boiler with individual air conditioning units, are compared against a decentralized business as usual scenario with individual electric space heaters, air conditioning units and storage-type electric water heaters. Electricity use and levelized cost were modeled in TRNSYS. For a 3-dwelling system with total thermal energy demand of 14.2 MW h/y and peak load of 12.7 kW, the district ground source heat pump configuration uses less electrical energy and power. However, the business as usual system has the lowest levelized cost due to the high cost of the ground-source heat pump installation. Levelized cost was most sensitive to capital cost and number of dwellings connected to the system for the district configurations considered. A 30% decrease in capital cost of the district system resulted in 21% average decrease of levelized cost, while a 100% increase in the number of dwellings resulted in an average 17% decrease of cost. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:这项研究分析了集中式系统为北加利福尼亚一小部分仅用电的低能耗住宅提供空间调节和生活热水的潜在好处。收益的分析是根据平均成本和现场能耗来进行的。比较了由一个中央地面源热泵和一个带有独立空调单元的中央电锅炉提供服务的两个区域方案与一个单独的空间加热器,空调单元和储水式电热水器的分散业务照常情况的比较。 。用电和平均成本在TRNSYS中建模。对于总热能需求为14.2 MW h / y,峰值负载为12.7 kW的三居室系统,区域地面源热泵配置使用的电能和功率较少。但是,由于地源热泵安装的高昂成本,按常规业务系统的平均成本最低。对于所考虑的区域配置,均摊成本对资本成本和连接到系统的住宅数量最敏感。区域系统的资本成本降低30%,导致平整成本平均降低21%,而住宅数量增加100%,成本平均降低17%。 (C)2015 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Energy and Buildings》 |2015年第4期|306-312|共7页
  • 作者单位

    Univ Calif Davis, Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn, Davis, CA 95616 USA|Univ Calif Davis, Program Int Energy Technol, Davis, CA 95616 USA;

    Univ Calif Davis, Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn, Davis, CA 95616 USA;

    Univ Calif Davis, Dept Biol & Agr Engn, Davis, CA 95616 USA;

    Univ Calif Davis, Program Int Energy Technol, Davis, CA 95616 USA|Univ Calif Davis, Dept Biol & Agr Engn, Davis, CA 95616 USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    District energy; Low-energy buildings; TRNSYS;

    机译:区域能源;低能耗建筑;TRNSYS;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号