首页> 外文期刊>Energy and Buildings >Optimal combination of thermal resistance of insulation materials and primary fuel sources for six climate zones of Japan
【24h】

Optimal combination of thermal resistance of insulation materials and primary fuel sources for six climate zones of Japan

机译:日本六个气候区的绝热材料和主要燃料来源的热阻的最佳组合

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Since the East Japan great earthquake disaster in March 2011, liquefied natural gas (LNG) to replace nuclear energy has become the most-used fuel source for energy generation in Japan. Japan is implementing energy conservation policy. Building energy consumption accounts for a large proportion of the total energy consumption. To better combine the thermal insulation of external walls and fuel source utilization will play an important role in building energy conservation. This paper aims at finding the optimal combination from four different insulation materials and four different fuel sources for residences using electricity for heating and cooling in the six climate zones ofJapan. The optimal thermal resistance (OTR) of insulation materials, energy cost saving per unit area of external walls and payback periods if the OTR is adopted for six climate zones are estimated via a cost analysis and degree-day (DD) method. According to the results, the optimal combination for all climate zones has been obtained by using rock wool as the insulation material and LNG as the fuel source. The energy cost saving.and payback periods are 20.4 $/m(2)-yr and 0.4 yrs respectively, while the OTR is 2.5 m(2)K/W for Sapporo (in climate zone I), 14.1 $/m2-yr and 0.5 yrs respectively, while the OTR is 2.1 m(2)K/W for Akita (in climate zone ll),11.2 $/m(2)-yr and 0.6 yrs respectively, while the OTR is 1.8 m(2)K/W for Fukushima (in climate zone III), 5.2 $/m(2)-yr and 0.8 yrs respectively, while the OTR is 1.3 m(2)K/W for Osaka (in climate zone IV), 2.5 $/m(2)-yr and 1.2 yrs respectively, while the OTR is 0.9 m(2)K/W for Kagoshima (in climate zone V), and there is no need to adopt thermal insulation for Naha (in climate zone VI). (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:自2011年3月东日本大地震灾难以来,液化天然气(LNG)替代核能已成为日本最常用的能源发电燃料。日本正在实施节能政策。建筑能耗占总能耗的很大一部分。更好地结合外墙的隔热和燃料源的利用将在建筑节能中发挥重要作用。本文旨在通过四种不同的隔热材料和四种不同的燃料来源,为日本六个气候带中的供暖和制冷住宅提供最佳的组合。绝缘材料的最佳热阻(OTR),外墙每单位面积的能源成本节省以及如果六个气候区采用OTR则可通过成本分析和度日(DD)方法估算出投资回收期。根据结果​​,通过使用岩棉作为绝缘材料并使用LNG作为燃料源,获得了所有气候区的最佳组合。能源成本节省和投资回收期分别为20.4 $ / m(2)-yr和0.4年,而札幌(在气候区I)的OTR为2.5 m(2)K / W,14.1 $ / m2-yr分别为0.5年和0.5年,而秋田(在气候带ll)的OTR为2.1 m(2)K / W,11.2 $ / m(2)-yr和0.6年,而OTR为1.8 m(2)K福岛(气候区III)的水/瓦,分别为5.2 $ / m(2)年和0.8年,而大阪(气候区IV)的OTR为1.3 m(2)K / W,2.5 $ / m (2)年和1.2年,而鹿儿岛(V区)的OTR为0.9 m(2)K / W,那霸市(VI区)无需采用隔热。 (C)2017 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号