...
首页> 外文期刊>Energy and Buildings >Barriers and challenges of the recommendation list of measures under the EPBD scheme: A critical review
【24h】

Barriers and challenges of the recommendation list of measures under the EPBD scheme: A critical review

机译:在EPBD计划下措施建议书列表的障碍和挑战:批判性审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) has an especial feature for existing buildings, a Recommendation List of Measures (RLM) designed to improve the energy performance of these buildings. This feature has not been properly studied by researchers or policymakers, in spite of being one of the main tools that can encourage building owners to perform renovation activities. Considering the scarce research focusing on the recommendations list of measures, more information is needed in order to identify weaknesses, barriers and improvements of this tool. This is especially important since the European commitment to reduce their emissions in 2020 are far from reaching the proposed goals, mainly becouse of the low renovation rate. This critical review is based on the current literature mainly from reports delivered by the Commission and academic research. The study focuses on the requirement set by the directive, its current performance, barriers and improvements that can be made to take this tool to a level that can be effectively used by policymakers, certifiers and owners. The upgrade of the recommendation list of measure should strengthen their calculation methods and procedure from both local authorities and the Commission. This should be in line with the certifiers' needs in order to do relevant work, including proper training, mandatory field inspections and tools. Lastly, financial policies and information should be implemented to accompany the certificate, ensuring that building owners interested in renovation have assistance and financial facilities or easy access to relevant information on this matter. The main conclusion of this study reveals that the regulatory framework could use some strictness in order to avoid 'just enough' implementations. Ambiguous definitions and too flexible obligations should be revised, especially cost-effectiveness and training for the certifiers. Attention on how to deliver the information to building owners should be increased, allowing them to understand the results, its implications and how to concretize renovation work through financial mechanisms, thus increasing the reliability of the EPC and the RLM. (c) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:能源绩效证书(EPC)具有现有建筑的特殊功能,是旨在提高这些建筑物能源性能的措施建议书(RLM)。尚未通过研究人员或政策制定者妥善研究此功能,尽管是可以鼓励业主进行翻新活动的主要工具之一。考虑到稀缺研究,重点关注措施的建议书清单,需要更多信息来识别该工具的弱点,障碍和改进。这尤为重要,因为欧洲对2020年减少排放的责任远未达到拟议的目标,主要原因是低改造率。这项批判性审查主要基于目前的文献,主要来自委员会和学术研究提供的报告。该研究侧重于指令,目前的性能,障碍和改进所设定的要求,这可以将此工具带到可以有效地由政策制定者,证书和业主有效地使用的水平。衡量标准升级应加强来自地方当局和委员会的计算方法和程序。这应该符合证书的需求,以便进行相关工作,包括适当的培训,强制性实地检查和工具。最后,应实施财务政策和信息,陪同证书,确保对改造感兴趣的建立业主有助于援助和金融设施或轻松获取此事的相关信息。本研究的主要结论揭示了监管框架可以使用一些严格的措施,以避免“足够的”实施。应修改模糊的定义和过于灵活的义务,特别是认证机构的成本效益和培训。注意如何增加对建筑业主的信息,允许他们通过财务机制来了解结果,其含义以及如何利用改造工作,从而提高EPC和RLM的可靠性。 (c)2020 Elsevier B.v.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号