首页> 外文期刊>Energy and Buildings >Energy and Exergy Performances of Floor, Ceiling, Wall Radiator and Stratum Ventilation Heating Systems for Residential Buildings
【24h】

Energy and Exergy Performances of Floor, Ceiling, Wall Radiator and Stratum Ventilation Heating Systems for Residential Buildings

机译:用于住宅建筑的地板,天花板,墙壁散热器和地层通风加热系统的能量和暴露性能

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To provide a highly efficient heating for the residential buildings, different heating systems, including the floor and ceiling heating, wall radiator heating and stratum ventilation heating, are compared based on a typical sleeping environment in this study. Performance indices, including occupied zone predicted mean vote (OPMV), energy consumption and exergy consumption, are analyzed under different conditions. The results show that stratum ventilation heating performs better than the conventional floor, ceiling and wall radiator heating in terms of energy and exergy consumptions. Firstly, under stratum ventilation heating, the OPMV equals zero at a low supply air temperature (20.0 degrees C for stratum ventilation heating at the supply air angle of 45 degrees and 19.7 degrees C for stratum ventilation heating mode at the supply air angle of 75 degrees). Secondly, stratum ventilation heating consumes less energy than the floor, ceiling or wall radiator heating of identical OPMV increments. In addition, compared with the floor, ceiling, wall radiator heating and stratum ventilation heating at the supply air angle of 45 degrees, the energy-saving ratio of stratum ventilation heating at the supply air angle of 75 degrees reaches 29.7%, 21.2%, 22.4% and 4.2% respectively when OPMV equals zero. Lastly, for stratum ventilation heating, the supply and return water temperatures in the air handling unit are significantly lower. Therefore, a lower exergy consumption is realized under stratum ventilation heating in comparison with the conventional floor, ceiling and wall radiator heating. (c) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:为住宅建筑提供高效的加热,基于本研究中的典型睡眠环境,比较了不同的加热系统,包括地板和天花板加热,壁散热器加热和地层通风加热。在不同条件下分析了在不同条件下分析了占用区的性能指数,包括占据区的平均投票(OPMV),能量消耗和消耗。结果表明,在能量和漏洞消耗方面,地层通风加热比传统地板,天花板和墙壁散热器加热更好。首先,在地层通气加热下,OPMV在低供应空气温度(用于在45度的供应空气角度为45度的地层通风加热20.0°C时等于零,对于75度的供应空气角度,在45℃的电源空气角度为45度,19.7摄氏度。 )。其次,地层通风加热比地板,天花板或壁散热器加热相同的OPMV增量的较低能量。另外,与地板,天花板,壁散热器加热和水层通风加热相比,供应空气角度为45度,水层通风加热的节能比75度的供应空气角度达到29.7%,21.2%,当OPMV等于零时,分别为22.4%和4.2%。最后,对于地层通风加热,空气处理单元中的供应和返回水温显着降低。因此,与传统地板,天花板和壁散热器加热相比,在地层通风加热下实现了较低的消耗。 (c)2020 Elsevier B.v.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号