首页> 外文期刊>Energy and Buildings >Potential benefits of cool walls on residential and commercial buildings across California and the United States: Conserving energy, saving money, and reducing emission of greenhouse gases and air pollutants
【24h】

Potential benefits of cool walls on residential and commercial buildings across California and the United States: Conserving energy, saving money, and reducing emission of greenhouse gases and air pollutants

机译:California和美国的住宅和商业建筑潜在好处:节约能源,节约资金,减少温室气体和空气污染物的排放

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Solar-reflective "cool" walls reduce absorption of sunlight by the building envelope, which may decrease cooling load in warm weather and increase heating load in cool weather. Changes to annual heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) energy use depend on climate, wall construction, wall orientation, building geometry, HVAC efficiency, and operating schedule. Changes to annual energy cost and energy-related emissions further vary with local energy prices and emission factors. We used EnergyPlus to perform over 100,000 whole-building energy simulations, spanning 10 different building categories, three building vintages, 16 California climate zones, and 15 United States (U.S.) climate zones.Cool walls yielded annual source energy, energy cost, and emission savings in all California climate zones and in warm U.S. (ASHRAE) climate zones. In California, annual whole-building HVAC energy cost savings were 4.0-27% in single-family homes, 0.5-3.8% in medium office buildings, and 0.0-8.5% in stand-alone retail stores. In warm U.S. climates-zones 1A (Miami, FL) through 4B (Albuquerque, NM)-annual HVAC energy cost savings were 1.8-8.3% in single-family homes, 0.3-4.6% in medium office buildings, and 0.5-11% in stand-alone retail stores. California and U.S. fractional source energy and emission savings were comparable to fractional energy cost savings. Per unit surface area modified, cool-wall savings often exceeded cool-roof savings because building codes typically prescribe much less wall insulation than roof insulation. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:太阳能反光的“酷”墙壁减少了建筑信封的阳光吸收,这可能会降低温暖天气的冷却负荷,并增加凉爽的天气中的加热负荷。年加热,通风和空调(HVAC)能源使用的变化取决于气候,墙壁建设,壁向,建筑物几何,HVAC效率和运营时间表。年度能源成本和能源相关排放的变化与地方能源价格和排放因素相得益彰。我们使用EnergyPlus进行超过100,000个全建筑能源模拟,跨越10种不同的建筑类别,三个建筑物葡萄酒,16个加利福尼亚气候区和15名美国(美国)气候区。池墙产生年度源头能源,能源成本和排放所有加利福尼亚气候区的节省以及温暖的美国(Ashrae)气候区。在加利福尼亚州,单家庭住宅的年度全建设HVAC能源成本节省4.0-27%,中间办公楼0.5-3.8%,独立零售店中的0.0-8.5%。在温暖的美国气候区1a(迈阿密,佛罗里达州)到4B(纳米克拉斯州,NM) - 单家庭住宅中的储蓄率为1.8-8.3%,中间办公楼0.3-4.6%,0.5-11%在独立零售店。加州和美国的分数源能量和排放量与分数能源成本节省相媲美。每单位表面积修改,凉爽壁节省通常超​​过凉爽屋顶的节省,因为建筑码通常比屋顶绝缘材料规定更少的墙壁绝缘。 (c)2019 Elsevier B.v.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号