首页> 外文期刊>Energy and Buildings >Effect of the energy-saving retrofit on the existing residential buildings in the typical city in northern China
【24h】

Effect of the energy-saving retrofit on the existing residential buildings in the typical city in northern China

机译:节能改造对中国北方典型城市现有民居建筑的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Since the last ten years, non-energy-saving residential buildings have been retrofitted in China. However, theoretical and practical effects did not match. Due to the lack of actual measurement, the effect of energy-saving retrofit is affected. This study emphasizes on heating energy consumption of the existing non-energy-saving residential buildings in typical cities in northern China and intends to measure them through a heat exchange station, a secondary network, and building during the heating season from 2015 to 2016 and from 2016 to 2017 (before and after retrofit). Comparing the actual measured energy consumption and the energy, consumption boundary index of each nod, the energy consumption levels before and after retrofit of different links are analyzed. Comparing the measured energy consumption data of the typical projects at each node before and after the retrofit and using the data standardization method, the buildings before and after the retrofits are at the same boundary conditions. And the actual energy consumption levels and energy savings before and after the transformation of different nodes are analyzed. The main influence factors are determined in the retrofit process. The effect of heat exchange station's control strategies on heating energy consumption is studied. The change of heating radius before and after retrofit is explored. Moreover, the influence of energy-saving retrofit on the indoor temperature and excess heating were analyzed. Results show that the energy-saving rates of the heat supply for heat exchange stations and the heat consumption of buildings were 12.5% and 15.6%, respectively. The intermittent regulation of the heat exchange station, after the energy saving retrofit, saved 18.5% compared with before retrofit, when the heating was stopped. The range of heating radius was expanded by 25.5% after retrofit. There was an increase of 2 centigrade in the indoor temperature of the buildings. And the pass rate of indoor temperature increased by about 20%. Energy loss cannot be ignored and it was caused by 32.8% increase in the excess heating rate. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:自最近十年以来,中国已对非节能住宅进行了改造。但是,理论效果和实际效果不符。由于缺乏实际测量,因此影响了节能改造的效果。这项研究着重于在中国北方典型城市中现有的非节能住宅建筑的供暖能耗,并打算通过换热站,二次网络以及从2015年至2016年供暖季节以及自2002年起的建筑物进行测量。 2016年至2017年(改造前后)。比较实际测得的能耗和每个节点的能耗,能耗边界指数,不同连接改造前后的能耗水平。比较改造前后每个节点的典型项目的实测能耗数据,并使用数据标准化方法,改造前后的建筑物处于相同的边界条件。并分析了不同节点转换前后的实际能耗水平和节能量。主要影响因素是在改造过程中确定的。研究了换热站控制策略对供热能耗的影响。探索了改造前后加热半径的变化。此外,分析了节能改造对室内温度和过量供暖的影响。结果表明,换热站供热的节能率和建​​筑物的热耗分别为12.5%和15.6%。节能改造后,换热站的间歇调节比停止加热前的改造前节省了18.5%。改造后,加热半径范围扩大了25.5%。建筑物的室内温度上升了2摄氏度。室内温度的合格率提高了约20%。能量损失不容忽视,这是由于过量加热速率增加了32.8%引起的。 (C)2018 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号