首页> 外文期刊>Empirica >Excise duties harmonisation and smoking in a model with cross-border arbitrage
【24h】

Excise duties harmonisation and smoking in a model with cross-border arbitrage

机译:消费税协调和吸烟在与跨境套利的模型中

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We use the 2007-2018 monthly data for five Western Balkan (WB) countries to estimate the impact of harmonisation of excise duties with the EU rules on the demand for cigarettes and tax revenues by taking into account the cross-border shopping effect. Both in time series and panel regressions we find strong evidence on cross-border arbitrage. The price elasticity of demand for cigarettes in WB countries is close to - 1, while the cross-border elasticity is 0.24. Full harmonisation of taxes with the EU directives would trigger a substantial decline in the demand for cigarettes on the legal market in the WB of 25.5% (approx. 931,000 smoker equivalents). In spite of a considerable behavioural reaction, harmonisation would still have positive effects on tax revenues of almost a half percent of GDP. The impact on cigarette consumption and tax revenues in a particular country depends on the relative magnitude of its own and cross-border price elasticity and the relative size of its tax rate gap compared to neighbouring countries. Failing to account for cross-border arbitrage in evaluating the impact of an increase in cigarette taxes leads to the results on demand effects being significantly overestimated and tax revenue effects underestimated.
机译:我们使用了五西巴尔干(WB)国家二〇〇七年至2018年的月度数据考虑到跨境购物的影响估计与香烟和税收需求的欧盟法规消费税的统一的影响。无论是在时间序列和面板回归,我们发现对跨境套利的有力证据。在WB国家卷烟需求的价格弹性接近 - 1,而跨境弹性为0.24。与欧盟指令税全部统一将引发25.5%的WB(约931,000吸烟者当量)卷烟需求的法律市场上大幅下降。尽管有相当的行为反应,协调仍然会对几乎占GDP的一半%的税收收入的积极作用。在一个特定国家对卷烟消费和税收的影响取决于其自身的相对大小和跨境价格弹性,并与邻国的税率差距的相对大小。在评估增加的卷烟税导致的结果对需求效应的影响,如果不考虑跨境套利被高估显著和税收的影响估计不足。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号