...
首页> 外文期刊>Empirical Software Engineering >Finding better active learners for faster literature reviews
【24h】

Finding better active learners for faster literature reviews

机译:寻找更好的积极学习者,以更快地获得文献综述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Literature reviews can be time-consuming and tedious to complete. By cataloging and refactoring three state-of-the-art active learning techniques from evidence-based medicine and legal electronic discovery, this paper finds and implements FASTREAD, a faster technique for studying a large corpus of documents, combining and parametrizing the most efficient active learning algorithms. This paper assesses FASTREAD using datasets generated from existing SE literature reviews (Hall, Wahono, Radjenovi, Kitchenham et al.). Compared to manual methods, FASTREAD lets researchers find 95% relevant studies after reviewing an order of magnitude fewer papers. Compared to other state-of-the-art automatic methods, FASTREAD reviews 20-50% fewer studies while finding same number of relevant primary studies in a systematic literature review.
机译:文献综述可能既费时又繁琐。通过从基于证据的医学和法律电子发现中对三种最先进的主动学习技术进行分类和重构,本文找到并实现了FASTREAD,FASTREAD是一种用于研究大型文档集,组合并参数化最有效的主动学习技术的更快技术。学习算法。本文使用现有SE文献评论(Hall,Wahono,Radjenovi,Kitchenham等人)生成的数据集评估FASTREAD。与手动方法相比,FASTREAD可使研究人员在审阅更少的论文后,可以找到95%的相关研究。与其他最新的自动方法相比,FASTREAD在系统的文献综述中评论的研究减少了20-50%,同时发现了相同数量的相关基础研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号