首页> 外文期刊>Empirical Software Engineering >An experimental investigation comparing individual and collaborative work productivity when using desktop and cloud modeling tools
【24h】

An experimental investigation comparing individual and collaborative work productivity when using desktop and cloud modeling tools

机译:使用桌面和云建模工具比较个人和协作工作效率的实验研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Successful modeling tools need to effectively support individual as well as team-based work (collaboration) within colocated and virtual environments. In the past, achieving this has been challenging, since traditional modeling tools are desktop-based and thus suitable for individual and colocated work only. However, with the rise of web-based architectures and the cloud paradigm, desktop modeling tools now have rivals in their web-based counterparts that are especially suited for online collaboration (e-collaboration). The objective of our research was to probe the question as to 'which type of modeling tools (desktop or cloud-based) performs better in cases of individual work and e-collaboration', and to obtain insights into the sources of the strengths and weaknesses regarding both types of modeling tools. A controlled experiment was performed in which we addressed two types of modeling tools-desktop and cloud-based, in respect to two types of work-individual and e-collaboration. Within these treatments, we observed the productivity of 129 undergraduate IT students, who performed different types of modeling activities. The experimental participants reported no statistical significant differences between self-reported expertise with the investigated tools as well as their overall characteristics. However, they did finish individual and e-collaborative activities faster when using cloud modeling tool, where significant differences in favor of the cloud modeling tool were detected during e-collaboration. If we aggregate the results, we can argue that cloud modeling tools are comparable with desktop modeling tools during individual activities and outperform them during e-collaboration. Our findings also correlate with the related research, stating that with the use of state-of-the-art Web technologies, cloud-based applications can achieve the user experience of desktop applications.
机译:成功的建模工具需要有效地支持位于同一环境和虚拟环境中的个人以及基于团队的工作(协作)。在过去,实现这一目标一直很困难,因为传统的建模工具是基于桌面的,因此仅适用于个人和共置工作。但是,随着基于Web的体系结构和云范例的兴起,桌面建模工具现在在其基于Web的对等产品中具有竞争对手,特别适合在线协作(电子协作)。我们研究的目的是探究“在个人工作和电子协作的情况下哪种类型的建模工具(台式机或基于云的)性能更好”的问题,并深入了解优势和劣势的根源关于两种类型的建模工具。进行了一个受控实验,其中我们针对两种类型的工作(个人和电子协作)处理了两种类型的建模工具:台式和基于云。在这些处理中,我们观察了129名IT专业本科生的生产力,他们进行了各种类型的建模活动。实验参与者报告说,自我报告的专业知识与研究工具及其整体特征之间没有统计学上的显着差异。但是,当使用云建模工具时,他们确实更快地完成了个人和电子协作活动,其中在电子协作过程中发现了有利于云建模工具的显着差异。如果我们汇总结果,我们可以说在单个活动中云建模工具可以与桌面建模工具相比,而在电子协作中则胜过它们。我们的发现还与相关研究相关,并指出通过使用最新的Web技术,基于云的应用程序可以实现桌面应用程序的用户体验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号