...
首页> 外文期刊>Empirical Economics >Estimating and forecasting with a two-country DSGE model of the Euro area and the USA: the merits of diverging interest-rate rules
【24h】

Estimating and forecasting with a two-country DSGE model of the Euro area and the USA: the merits of diverging interest-rate rules

机译:使用欧元区和美国的两国DSGE模型进行估计和预测:不同利率规则的优点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In this paper we estimate and forecast with a small-scale DSGE model of the Euro area and the USA characterized by diverging interest-rate rules using quarterly data from 1996Q2 to 2011Q2. These diverging rules reflect the differing mandates of the ECB and the Fed, respectively. Due to its primary objective of price stability, the ECB is supposed to conduct monetary policy by considering producer-price inflation only (single mandate), whereas the Fed is assumed to conduct its policy by taking into account the output gap in addition to producer-price inflation (dual mandate). In terms of the RMSE and the MAE, the DSGE model with diverging interest-rate rules outperforms a DSGE model with identical interest-rate rules in almost 70% of all cases for almost all variables across forecast horizons out of sample. It also compares well with BVAR benchmarks. For shorter horizons, we find some statistically significant differences in forecast accuracy between rival models. For forecast horizons three and four quarters ahead, the null hypothesis of equal forecast accuracy can seldom be rejected.
机译:在本文中,我们使用欧元区和美国的小规模DSGE模型进行估计和预测,其特征是使用1996年2季度至2011年2季度的季度数据来划分利率规则。这些不同的规则分别反映了欧洲央行和美联储的不同授权。由于价格稳定的主要目标,欧洲央行应该仅通过考虑生产者价格通胀(单一指令)来实施货币政策,而美联储则要在考虑生产者价格差距的基础上考虑其产出缺口来实施其政策。价格通胀(双重授权)。就RMSE和MAE而言,在几乎所有样本范围内的几乎所有变量中,几乎所有变量中,利率规则均不相同的DSGE模型优于利率规则相同的DSGE模型。它也可以与BVAR基准进行比较。对于较短的视野,我们发现竞争对手模型之间的预测准确性在统计上有显着差异。对于未来三到四个季度的预测范围,很少会拒绝具有相同预测精度的零假设。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号