首页> 外文期刊>Electronics world^ 11F; / Electronic Industries Association >Audio power amplifier frequency compensation: Is PLIL an Alternative to the Miller Capacitor?
【24h】

Audio power amplifier frequency compensation: Is PLIL an Alternative to the Miller Capacitor?

机译:音频功率放大器频率补偿:PLIL是否可以替代米勒电容器?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The transistor audio amplifier can be generalised as having an input stage, which may be a single transistor or differential pair, a voltage amplifying stage (VAS), a driver pair and an output pair as shown in Fig. 1. As there are more than two time constants encompassed by the feedback loop, negative feedback can cause instability that requires frequency compensation to put right. A common method to stabilise amplifiers is to use a "Miller" capacitor Ccomp, as this causes a monotonic roll-off at 6dB/octave, which is, as Nyquist, Bode and others have shown, stable. Many audio amplifiers, ranging from the decidedly mediocre (typically from the 60's and 70's) to good ones from the 90's, use the Miller capacitor. An inherent problem with the Miller capacitor is that it delays the output voltage response and thus the negative feedback to the input stage. If the input signal is fast enough, this will cause transient distortion due to overloading in the input stage, until such time as the feedback "catches up" with it. The problem can be eliminated by using resistors in series with the input transistor emitters which are large enough to prevent overloading in the input stage, or using moderate resistors and increasing the current in the input stage to achieve the same voltage margin, such that the input transistors do not cut off for any input within normal limits. This approach to "fast slew" was exploited by Stochino. I hasten to add that for ref. 1, transient distortion from slewing does not arise for normal audio-band signals usually taken to be 20kHz maximum, as it has a good margin to at least to 150kHz. Nevertheless, the potential for input stage overload is not desirable, and the Miller capacitor method of compensation is not one which I would use by preference. However, the search for an alternative is not easy but phase lead compensation with input lag (PLIL) seems to be a possibility. This article reports on the investigations I have undertaken in the PLIL approach.
机译:晶体管音频放大器可以概括为具有一个输入级,可以是单个晶体管或差分对,一个电压放大级(VAS),一个驱动器对和一个输出对,如图1所示。反馈回路包含两个时间常数,负反馈会导致不稳定,需要进行频率补偿。稳定放大器的常用方法是使用“米勒”电容器Ccomp,因为这会导致6dB /倍频程的单调衰减,正如Nyquist,Bode等人所表明的那样,它是稳定的。许多音频放大器都使用Miller电容器,从绝对中等的放大器(通常从60年代和70年代)到优秀的90年代。米勒电容器的固有问题是,它会延迟输出电压响应,从而延迟输入级的负反馈。如果输入信号足够快,则会由于输入级过载而导致瞬态失真,直到反馈“赶上”它。可以通过使用与输入晶体管发射极串联的电阻来消除此问题,该电阻要足够大以防止输入级过载,或者使用适当的电阻器并增加输入级电流以实现相同的电压裕度,从而使输入正常输入范围内,任何输入均不会切断晶体管。 Stochino开发了这种“快速转换”方法。我赶紧将其添加为参考。如图1所示,对于通常被认为最大为20kHz的正常音频信号,不会出现由回转引起的瞬态失真,因为它具有至少150kHz的良好余量。尽管如此,输入级过载的可能性还是不理想的,而且米勒电容器补偿方法也不是我会首选使用的方法。但是,寻找替代方案并不容易,但是具有输入滞后的相位超前补偿(PLIL)似乎是可行的。本文报告了我在PLIL方法中进行的调查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号