首页> 外文期刊>Electronics and communications in Japan >Analysis of Physiological Effect of Reading Books by Paper and Electronic Medium
【24h】

Analysis of Physiological Effect of Reading Books by Paper and Electronic Medium

机译:纸质和电子介质阅读书籍的生理效应分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Digital books have become popular as electronic media has become more common. An evaluation that includes not only a subjective assessment of readability or usability, but also an objective assessment of psychometric health impact is needed. The goal of this study is an objective assessment of the physiological and psychological effects of reading books using electronic or paper media. This paper focuses on hemodynamic parameters. The measurement items include VAS and POMS as a psychological index and hemodynamic parameters as a physiological index. As a result, low levels of vigor and limited readability were recognized as significant (p < 0.05) when reading a book using electronic media as compared to paper media. The cardiovascular system was actively engaged in coping because of sympathetic hyperactivity in the hemodynamic reaction. By contrast, using electronic media was not seen to involve stress coping. We also found that the parasympathetic nervous system activity was enhanced by the illegibility of sentences and fatigue due to using electronic media. Based on all of these results, we identified a difference in how people react physiologically when reading a book using electronic and paper media.
机译:随着电子媒体的普及,数字图书已变得越来越流行。需要进行评估,不仅包括对可读性或可用性的主观评估,还包括对心理健康影响的客观评估。这项研究的目的是客观评估使用电子或纸质媒体阅读书籍的生理和心理影响。本文重点研究血液动力学参数。测量项目包括作为心理指标的VAS和POMS以及作为生理指标的血液动力学参数。结果,与纸质媒体相比,当使用电子媒体阅读书籍时,低水平的活力和有限的可读性被认为是重要的(p <0.05)。由于血液动力学反应中交感神经过度活跃,心血管系统积极参与应对。相比之下,使用电子媒体并不涉及应对压力。我们还发现,由于使用电子媒体,句子的难以辨认和疲劳增强了副交感神经系统的活动。基于所有这些结果,我们确定了人们在使用电子和纸质媒体阅读书籍时的生理反应方面的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号