首页> 外文期刊>The Electronic Library >Preference of Bangladesh university students for searching the library catalogue OPAC or discovery tool?
【24h】

Preference of Bangladesh university students for searching the library catalogue OPAC or discovery tool?

机译:孟加拉国大学生更喜欢搜索图书馆目录OPAC还是发现工具?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose - The aim of this paper was to compare university students' preferences for searching the library catalogue via the library's Koha online public access catalogue (OPAC) or its discovery tool VuFind. Design/methodology/approach - A total of 175 students responded to a questionnaire-based survey through which their demographic data, duration (years) of computer use and their self-reported levels of computer skills were obtained. Students were asked what interfaces they use for catalogue searching and to rate their opinion on the relevant interfaces on a seven-point Likert scale. Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests were conducted to statistically compare the differences between students' demographic/individual characteristics and their ratings on the respective interfaces. For those students who used both systems, differences between their Likert ratings were assessed using a one-tailed Wilcoxon signed rank test. Findings - The results showed that there were no significant differences among students in terms of their ratings on either the OP AC or VuFind interfaces. Wilcoxon signed ranks test indicated that significantly more students thought that VuFind was more usable than the Koha OP AC. Originality/value - This is a pioneering study of the current use of the OP AC and discovery tools by university students and their preferences for searching catalogue information through these systems. It is hoped that the findings of this study will encourage researchers to conduct task-based usability studies with various cataloguing tools and this could yield new and improved interaction designs for library catalogue searching.
机译:目的-本文的目的是比较大学生通过图书馆的Koha在线公共访问目录(OPAC)或其发现工具VuFind搜索图书馆目录的偏好。设计/方法/方法-共有175名学生对基于问卷的调查进行了回答,通过该调查他们的人口统计学数据,计算机使用的持续时间(年)以及他们自我报告的计算机技能水平。学生被问到他们使用什么界面进行目录搜索,并以七分制李克特量表对他们对相关界面的评价。进行了Mann-Whitney和Kruskal-Wallis检验,以统计学方式比较学生的人口统计/个人特征与其在相应界面上的评分之间的差异。对于同时使用两种系统的学生,他们的李克特评分之间的差异是通过单尾Wilcoxon符号秩检验来评估的。结果-结果显示,在OP AC或VuFind界面上,学生的评分没有显着差异。 Wilcoxon签署的等级测试表明,明显有更多的学生认为VuFind比Koha OP AC更有用。原创性/价值-这是对大学生当前使用OP AC和发现工具及其通过这些系统搜索目录信息的偏好的开创性研究。希望这项研究的结果能够鼓励研究人员使用各种分类工具进行基于任务的可用性研究,并且可以为图书馆目录搜索提供新的和改进的交互设计。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号