...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecosystems >Performance of the Redfield Ratio and a Family of Nutrient Limitation Indicators as Thresholds for Phytoplankton N vs. P Limitation
【24h】

Performance of the Redfield Ratio and a Family of Nutrient Limitation Indicators as Thresholds for Phytoplankton N vs. P Limitation

机译:Redfield比率的性能和一系列营养限制指标作为浮游植物N与P限制的阈值

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

We aim to define the best nutrient limitation indicator predicting phytoplankton biomass increase as a result of nutrient enrichment (N, P, or both). We compare the abilities of different indicators, based on chemical measurements of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) fractions in the initial plankton community, to predict the limiting factor for phytoplankton growth as inferred independently from short-term laboratory experiments on the same natural communities in a data set from NE Baltic Sea (Tamminen and Andersen, Mar Ecol Prog Ser 340:121–138, 2007). The best indicators had a true positive rate of about 80% for predicting both N and P limitation, but with a higher false positive rate for N than for P limitation (25 vs. 5%). Estimated threshold ratios for total nutrients (TN:TP) were substantially higher than the Redfield ratio, reflecting the relatively high amounts of biologically less available dissolved organic N in the study area. The best overall performing indicator, DIN:TP, had chlorophyll-response based threshold ratios far below Redfield, with N limitation below 2:1 and P limitation above 5:1 (by atoms). On the contrary, particulate N:P ratio was the overall worst predictor for N or P limitation, with values clustering around the Redfield N:P ratio (16:1, by atoms) independent of the limiting factor. Estimated threshold ratios based on inorganic nutrients (DIN:DIP) and so-called biologically available nutrients (BAN:BAP = (PON + DIN):(POP + DIP)) were also generally clearly above 16:1, indicating that the Redfield ratio rather reflects the transition from N limitation to combined N + P limitation, than to single limitation by P. Coastal systems are complex systems with regard to nutrient dynamics, historically considered to represent the transition from P-limited freshwater to N-limited marine systems. Our analysis shows that rather simple ratios reflect phytoplankton requirement for nutrients. Based on the high prediction performance, analytical considerations, and general data availability, the DIN:TP ratio appears to be the best indicator for inferring in situ N vs. P limitation of phytoplankton from chemical monitoring data.
机译:我们旨在定义最佳营养限度指标,以预测由于营养富集(氮,磷或两者兼而有之)而使浮游植物生物量增加。我们根据初始浮游生物群落中氮(N)和磷(P)组分的化学测量结果,比较了不同指标的能力,以预测由同一自然环境中的短期实验室实验独立推断出的浮游植物生长的限制因素东北波罗的海的数据集中的生物群落(Tamminen和Andersen,Mar Ecol Prog Ser 340:121-138,2007)。最好的指标对于预测N和P限制均具有约80%的真实阳性率,但N的阳性率高于P限制(25 vs. 5%)。总营养素的估计阈值比率(TN:TP)大大高于Redfield比率,这反映了研究区域中相对较少的生物学上可利用的可溶性有机氮含量。最佳总体指标DIN:TP具有基于叶绿素响应的阈值比率,远低于Redfield,其中N限制低于2:1,P限制高于5:1(按原子计)。相反,颗粒N:P比率是N或P限制的总体最差预测指标,其值聚集在Redfield N:P比率(按原子计算为16:1)周围,而与限制因素无关。基于无机养分(DIN:DIP)和所谓的生物可利用养分(BAN:BAP =(PON + DIN):( POP + DIP))的估计阈值比率通常也明显高于16:1,表明Redfield比率相反,它反映了从N限制到N + P联合限制的转变,而不是P的单一限制。沿海地区的养分动力学是复杂的系统,历史上一直被认为代表了从P限制的淡水到N限制的海洋系统的转变。我们的分析表明,相当简单的比率反映出浮游植物对营养的需求。基于高的预测性能,分析考虑和常规数据可用性,DIN:TP比似乎是从化学监测数据推断浮游植物原位N与P限制的最佳指标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号