...
首页> 外文期刊>EContent >Should Social Media Censor Content?
【24h】

Should Social Media Censor Content?

机译:社交媒体审查应该满足吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Before Twitter and YouTube could respond, millions of users saw video of journalist James Foley being beheaded. An equally large number of people were privy to naked photos of celebrities on sites such as 4chan and reddit, after a hacker illegally stole the photos from the cloud. These were eventually removed, but not before a surprising controversy rose up around these instances: Should social media sites be in the business of censoring content-and, by extension, users? Leslie Paul Machado, Virginia-based partner in LeClairRyan and co-chair of the national law firm's Media, Internet and E-commerce Industry team, says free speech applies even to distasteful episodes, such as the Foley beheading video or the celebrity photo scandal. "For example, the Supreme Court has upheld the right of anti-gay protestors at military funerals and the burning of the flag," Machado says. "That being said, we are increasingly witnessing websites taking down content like the Foley video or the stolen celebrity photos, usually because they violate the website's terms of use."
机译:在Twitter和YouTube做出回应之前,数百万用户看到了记者詹姆斯·弗利被斩首的视频。在黑客非法窃取云中的照片之后,同样大量的人都对诸如4chan和reddit等网站上的名人裸露的照片保密。这些内容最终被删除,但在围绕这些实例出现的令人惊讶的争议之前,这还没有:社交媒体网站是否应负责审查内容,并扩展用户? LeClairRyan的弗吉尼亚州合伙人,国家律师事务所媒体,互联网和电子商务行业团队的联席主席莱斯利·保罗·马查多(Leslie Paul Machado)说,言论自由甚至适用于令人反感的事件,例如Foley斩首视频或名人照片丑闻。马查多说:“例如,最高法院在军事葬礼和焚毁国旗方面维持了反同性恋抗议者的权利。” “话虽如此,我们越来越多地目睹网站删除诸如Foley视频或被盗名人照片之类的内容,通常是因为它们违反了网站的使用条款。”

著录项

  • 来源
    《EContent》 |2014年第9期|6-8|共3页
  • 作者

    KEITH LORIA;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号