首页> 外文期刊>The economist >Try it and see
【24h】

Try it and see

机译:试试看

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In the scientific pecking order, social scientists are usually looked down on by their peers in the natural sciences. Real scientists do experiments to test their theo-ries―or, if they cannot, try to look for natural phenomena that can act in lieu of experiments. Social scientists, it is widely thought, do not subject their own hypotheses to any such rigorous treatment. Worse, they peddle their untested hypotheses to governments, and try to get them turned into policies. The Campbell Collaboration, whose second annual conference has just taken place in Philadelphia, exists to change both this perception and the reality behind it by advancing the cause of "evidence-based" social policy. The collaboration is an international, independent, non-profit organisation that brings together social scientists, statisticians and policymakers. Its aim is to assemble and evaluate the best available evidence for the effectiveness of various social interventions. In particular, that means evidence from experiments.
机译:按照科学啄的顺序,社会科学家通常在自然科学领域遭到同行的鄙视。真正的科学家会做实验以测试他们的理论,或者,如果不能,则尝试寻找可以代替实验起作用的自然现象。人们普遍认为,社会科学家不会对自己的假设进行任何严格的处理。更糟糕的是,他们将未经检验的假设推销给政府,并试图将其转变为政策。坎贝尔合作社(Campbell Collaboration)的第二届年会刚刚在费城举行,其存在是通过推进“循证”社会政策的起因来改变这种看法及其背后的现实。这项合作是一个国际性,独立的非营利性组织,汇集了社会科学家,统计学家和决策者。其目的是收集和评估各种社会干预措施有效性的最佳证据。特别是,这意味着可以从实验中获得证据。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The economist》 |2002年第8262期|p.77-78|共2页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 经济;各科经济学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:33:11
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号