【24h】

Hero or hoax

机译:英雄或骗局

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

James shapiro follows his award-winning book on William Shakespeare, "1599", which came out in 2005, with an unlikely subject: an investigation into the old chestnut that Shakespeare wasn't the man who wrote the works.rnMost mainstream Shakespeareans stand aloof from it. But apparently the claims of Francis Bacon, Edward de Vere and Christopher Marlowe, among others, are on the rise. An appetite for conspiracy theories, combined with a call for "balance" from some sectors of academe and the rise of the internet have given the thing new life. Respectable audiences turn up to listen to lectures on it. The controversy is even taught at university level. "What difference does it make who wrote the plays?" someone asked the author wearily. Mr Shapiro (for whom Shakespeare was definitely the man) thinks it matters a lot, and by the end of this book, his readers will think so too.
机译:詹姆斯·夏皮罗(James Shapiro)紧随其获奖书籍威廉·莎士比亚(William Shakespeare)的著作“ 1599”(2005年问世),书的主题不太可能:对古老的栗子进行调查,认为莎士比亚不是作家的人。从中。但是显然弗朗西斯·培根,爱德华·德·维尔和克里斯托弗·马洛等人的主张正在上升。对阴谋理论的浓厚兴趣,再加上学术界某些部门呼吁“保持平衡”,以及互联网的兴起,使事情有了新生。可敬的观众出现在听讲座。争议甚至在大学教授。 “这让谁来写剧本有什么不同?”有人疲倦地问作者。夏皮罗先生(莎士比亚绝对是他的男人)认为这很重要,到本书结尾时,他的读者也会这么认为。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The economist》 |2010年第8675期|p.89-90|共2页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:30:24

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号