首页> 外文期刊>The economist >Coal states v Uncle Sam
【24h】

Coal states v Uncle Sam

机译:煤炭国诉山姆大叔

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Congress passed the Clean Air Act to reduce harmful air pollution. The Environmental Protection Agency (epa) issues regulations to enforce that law. But 21 states are asking the Supreme Court to rule that the epa has overstepped its authority. The case of Michigan v epa, which was argued on March 25th, concerns the agency's plan to regulate mercury, arsenic and other toxins emitted by power plants. Both sides agree that the new rule would cost about $9.6 billion a year to implement. The epa estimates that reduced mercury emissions would bring health benefits of up to $6m a year-a tiny sum it reached only after assuming that lots of pregnant "women in subsistence fishing populations" will eat vast amounts of mercury-tainted fish and thereby reduce their children's IQs by an undetectable 0.002 points each.
机译:国会通过了《清洁空气法》,以减少有害的空气污染。环境保护署(EPA)颁布法规以执行该法律。但是,有21个州要求最高法院裁定EPA超越了其权威。 3月25日,Michigan v epa案遭到争议,该案涉及该机构管制发电厂排放的汞,砷和其他毒素的计划。双方都同意,新规则的实施每年将花费约96亿美元。美国环保署(EPA)估计,减少汞排放将带来每年600万美元的健康收益-只有在假设许多怀孕的“自给自足捕鱼人口中的妇女”将吃掉大量受汞污染的鱼后,才能达到这一数额。每个孩子的智商都无法检测到0.002分。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The economist》 |2015年第8931期|35-35|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:28:19

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号