首页> 外文期刊>The economist >The opening act
【24h】

The opening act

机译:开幕式

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Spanish civil war, which began in 1936, three years before the second world war, was far more than a local scrap between reactionary Roman Catholic traditionalists and domestic left-wingers of multiple shades. To say it was the Vietnam, Korea or Afghanistan of its time is to sell it short. Yet the global war that followed drowned out the echoes of what was, in effect, one of its principal opening acts. Richard Rhodes, a Pulitzer prize-winning American popular historian, reminds readers that this was an international war from the start. Hitler and Musso- lini made decisive contributions of arms and men to the future dictator, General Francisco Franco, a man who boasted of preferring blood and bayonets to "hypocritical elections". Stalin, with less enthusiasm, backed the republic, while the Soviet-controlled Comintern channelled communism's global ambitions. The most shameful absence was of the eventual victors in the 20th century's long war of ideologies-the fence-sitting liberal democracies led by Britain, France and America that failed to support an elected republican government against Franco's military rebels, thereby emboldening their backers.
机译:西班牙内战始于1936年,即第二次世界大战之前的三年,远远超出了反动的罗马天主教传统主义者和国内各派左翼分子之间的局部残局。说它是那个时代的越南,韩国或阿富汗就是卖掉它。然而,随后的全球战争淹没了实际上是其主要开放行动之一的回声。理查德·罗兹(Richard Rhodes)是普利策奖得主,美国流行历史学家,他提醒读者,这从一开始就是一场国际战争。希特勒和墨索里尼为未来的独裁者弗朗西斯科·佛朗哥将军做出了决定性的贡献。弗朗西斯科·佛朗哥将军自吹自blood地喜欢用血腥和刺刀代替“虚伪的选举”。斯大林不那么热情地支持共和国,而苏联控制的共产国际则引导共产主义的全球野心。最可耻的缺席是20世纪漫长的意识形态战争的最终胜利者-由英国,法国和美国领导的围栏式自由民主国家未能支持民选共和党政府反对佛朗哥的军事叛乱分子,从而鼓舞了他们的支持者。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The economist》 |2015年第8923期|74-74|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号