首页> 外文期刊>The economist >Here we go again?
【24h】

Here we go again?

机译:再来一次?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

SINCE the vote to leave the European Union in June 2016, the more optimistic among those on the losing side have been lobbying for a rematch. Some argue for a re-run on the basis that Brexiteers lied during the campaign and broke election law (on July 17th the Electoral Commission fined the official Vote Leave campaign £61,000, or $80,000, for deliberately exceeding spending limits). Others say the public deserves a chance to vote on the final deal, which will bear little resemblance to the glittering one they were promised. Yet the idea of a second vote has never taken off. Polls have shifted only slightly in favour of remaining, and there is no great enthusiasm for another plebiscite, which would be the fourth nationwide vote in as many years.
机译:自从2016年6月投票决定退出欧盟以来,输家中较为乐观的人们一直在游说重赛。一些人主张重新选举是基于竞选期间英国退欧者撒谎并违反选举法(7月17日,选举委员会对故意投票支出竞选罚款61,000英镑(合80,000美元),原因是故意超过支出限额。还有人说,公众应该有机会对最终交易进行投票,这与他们所承诺的闪闪发光的交易几乎没有相似之处。然而,第二次投票的想法从未成功。民意测验仅略微改变了以保留民意,对另一次全民投票的热情不高,这将是多年以来全国范围内的第四次投票。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The economist》 |2018年第9101期|43-44|共2页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号