首页> 外文期刊>The economist >Seen and not herd
【24h】

Seen and not herd

机译:看到而不是群体

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

AT FIRST SIGHT, the decision by America's Food and Drug Administration to pause the roll-out of the covid-19 vaccine from Johnson & Johnson is a comparable setback to that in Europe over the Oxford-AstraZeneca jab. In both cases the worry is about whether there is a link with blood clots. And in both cases, such clots are extremely rare, meaning that in most circumstances not getting a shot is a far higher risk to health. Yet whereas in Europe the AstraZeneca blow came at a time when countries were struggling to supply vaccines, America is now awash with them. So the main impact in America is less on supply than on people's wariness about getting vaccinated at all. The country is close to delivering jabs to almost all who want them. Unfortunately, only seven in ten Americans are interested. To suppress the coronavirus effectively, 70% or more of the entire population must be vaccinated-a high bar, given that the vaccine is not administered to those under 16. Anything that reduces take-up makes such herd immunity even harder to attain.
机译:乍一看,美国食品和药物管理局的决定暂停来自约翰逊&约翰逊的Covid-19疫苗的滚动是欧洲在牛津 - 阿斯蒂伦·贾巴上的比较挫折。在这两种情况下,担心是关于是否存在与血凝块的联系。在这两种情况下,这种凝块都非常罕见,这意味着在大多数情况下,没有射击的情况越来越高的健康风险。然而,虽然在欧洲,Astrazeneca打击了一个各国在努力供应疫苗的时候出现,而美国现在也令他们畏缩。因此,美国的主要影响较少供应量比人民对受疫苗接种的警惕性。该国接近将Jabs交付给几乎所有想要它们的人。不幸的是,十名美国人只有七个都感兴趣。为了有效地抑制冠状病毒,必须接种疫苗的70%或更多的群体 - 一个高杆,鉴于疫苗未施用于16岁以下的疫苗。减少占用的任何东西使得这种畜群免疫力甚至更难以达到。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The economist》 |2021年第9241期|共2页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-19 02:08:19

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号