首页> 外文期刊>Economic Theory >Price caps, oligopoly, and entry
【24h】

Price caps, oligopoly, and entry

机译:价格上限,寡头垄断和进入

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

We extend the analysis of price caps in oligopoly markets to allow for sunk entry costs and endogenous entry. In the case of deterministic demand and constant marginal cost, reducing a price cap yields increased total output, consumer welfare, and total welfare, results consistent with those for oligopoly markets with a fixed number of firms. With deterministic demand and increasing marginal cost, these comparative static results may be fully reversed, and a welfare-improving cap may not exist. Recent results in the literature show that for a fixed number of firms, if demand is stochastic and marginal cost is constant, then lowering a price cap may either increase or decrease output and welfare (locally); however, a welfare-improving price cap does exist. In contrast to these recent results, we show that a welfare-improving cap may not exist if entry is endogenous. However, within this stochastic demand environment we show that certain restrictions on the curvature of demand are sufficient to ensure the existence of a welfare-improving cap when entry is endogenous.
机译:我们扩展了寡头市场价格上限的分析,以考虑下沉的进入成本和内生进入。在确定性需求和恒定边际成本的情况下,降低价格上限会增加总产出,消费者福利和总福利,其结果与拥有固定数量公司的寡头市场的结果一致。随着确定性需求和边际成本的增加,这些比较静态的结果可能会被完全逆转,并且可能不存在改善福利的上限。文献中的最新结果表明,对于一定数量的公司,如果需求是随机的,边际成本是恒定的,则降低价格上限可能会(局部)增加或减少产出和福利。但是,确实存在提高福利的价格上限。与这些最新结果相反,我们表明,如果进入是内生的,则可能不存在提高福利的上限。但是,在这种随机的需求环境中,我们表明,对需求曲率的某些限制足以确保进入为内生性时存在改善福利的上限。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号