首页> 外文期刊>Economic Outlook >Will aggressive fiscal retrenchment choke off the UK recovery?
【24h】

Will aggressive fiscal retrenchment choke off the UK recovery?

机译:激进的财政紧缩会抑制英国的复苏吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

1. The emergency Budget of late-June saw the new Chancellor, George Osborne, initiate a significant acceleration in the pace of fiscal tightening. Our modelling suggests that the Budget measures will damage short-term growth prospects but, other things being equal, the UK should avoid a double dip. Lower government borrowing should feed through into lower long-term interest rates, providing support to households and companies, while the fact that the Chancellor has 'back loaded' a significant proportion of the spending cuts means that there should be time for the recovery to become firmly entrenched before the deepest cuts begin to hit.rn2. The new Chancellor inherited once of the largest levels of public borrowing in the developed world. Markets have given the UK considerable leeway so far, but this is partly because the incoming government created an expectation of much tighter policy. And though the stock of debt is average for a developed economy - and its maturity long - the UK is adding to it rapidly, risking a debt spiral. There are many arguments in favour of aggressive retrenchment, with empirical evidence linking high levels of borrowing and debt to economic underperformance.rn3. The literature is clear is that retrenchments based on cutting spending have a much better chance of succeeding than those focused on increasing taxation. Tax rises tend to blunt incentives, but spending-based adjustments can boost growth through the effects on interest rates, the exchange rate, unit labour costs and corporate profitability. The government has regularly cited the Canadian retrenchment of 1994-97 as a template to follow and this favoured spending cuts over tax rises by a ratio of 4:1.rn4. In constructing his budget package, Mr Osborne stuck closely to both the literature and the Canadian template. The focus on current spending, in particular reform of the welfare system and reductions in the public sector pay bill are consistent with previous successful retrenchments. The increase in VAT and the adoption of Labour's plans for cutting capital spending appear less than optimal, though it could be argued that the sheer scale of the deficit meant that these measures were unavoidable.rn5. The Office for Budget Responsibility estimates that the Budget measures will have a very modest impact on growth prospects. Our modelling suggests that, in the short-term, their assessment looks distinctly optimistic and our forecast now shows the UK economy growing by just 2.1% in 2011 - much weaker than we would usually see at this stage of a recovery but far removed from a double dip.rn6. However, there are a number of risks to the outlook. The government must first provide a credible plan for cutting departmental spending and then provide tangible evidence that it is achieving those cuts, if it is to keep markets onside. It will also be reliant on conditions outside its control remaining favourable, namely the Bank of England keeping monetary policy loose, the pound remaining weak and our most important trading partner, the Eurozone, weathering its own fiscal retrenchment.
机译:1. 6月下旬的紧急预算案使新任总理乔治•奥斯本(George Osborne)大大加快了财政紧缩的步伐。我们的模型表明,预算措施将损害短期增长前景,但在其他条件相同的情况下,英国应避免两次下跌。较低的政府借贷应转化为较低的长期利率,从而为家庭和公司提供支持,而财政大臣已经“背负了”很大一部分削减支出的事实,这意味着应该有时间恢复经济在最深的切口开始击中之前就已经牢固地确立了根源。新任总理继承了发达国家最大水平的公共借款。到目前为止,市场给英国留有很大的回旋余地,但这在一定程度上是因为新任政府对实行更严格政策的期望。尽管债务存量对发达经济体来说是平均水平,而且期限很长,但英国正在迅速增加债务,这有可能导致债务螺旋上升。有许多论据主张采取积极的裁员措施,经验证据表明,高水平的借贷和债务与经济表现不佳相关。有文献清楚地表明,与那些致力于增加税收的裁员相比,基于削减支出的裁员成功的机会要大得多。税收增加往往会抑制刺激措施,但是基于支出的调整可以通过影响利率,汇率,单位劳动成本和企业盈利能力来促进增长。政府经常引用1994-97年加拿大的裁员作为范本,这种做法有利于削减开支,而不是增加税率,比例为4:1.rn4。奥斯本先生在制定预算案时,既紧紧抓住文学作品,又紧紧抓住加拿大模板。对当前支出的关注,特别是对福利制度的改革以及公共部门工资支出的减少,与先前成功的裁员是一致的。增值税的增加和工党削减资本支出计划的采用似乎不是最佳选择,尽管可以认为赤字的绝对规模意味着这些措施是不可避免的。预算责任办公室估计,预算措施将对增长前景产生很小的影响。我们的模型表明,从短期来看,他们的评估看起来非常乐观,我们的预测现在显示,英国经济在2011年仅增长2.1%,比我们通常在复苏阶段所看到的要弱得多,但与经济复苏相去甚远。两次浸入但是,前景存在许多风险。政府必须首先提供削减部门开支的可靠计划,然后再提供切实的证据表明,如果要保持市场优势,它正在实现这些削减。它还将依赖其控制范围以外的条件继续保持有利,即英格兰银行保持宽松的货币政策,英镑保持疲软以及我们最重要的贸易伙伴欧元区度过自己的财政紧缩。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Economic Outlook》 |2010年第3期|P.5-14|共10页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号