首页> 外文期刊>Economic modelling >Is optimal Islamic financial contract stabilizing? The perspective of a New Keynesian model with the financial accelerator
【24h】

Is optimal Islamic financial contract stabilizing? The perspective of a New Keynesian model with the financial accelerator

机译:最佳的伊斯兰金融合同稳定吗?金融加速器的新凯恩斯主义模型的视角

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper aims to inspect the stabilization aspects of Islamic financial contracts by drawing on a New Keynesian macroeconomic model with the financial accelerator. The model allows for shared responsibilities on both the assets and liabilities sides of the Islamic banks that resemble, in principle, the two-tiered Mudarabah financing on the asset side and profit-sharing investment accounts on the liability side. The implied optimal Islamic financial contract argues that payoff distribution between entrepreneur and bank is contingent on the macroeconomic environment via the entrepreneur's leverage, whereas that between bank and investors is endogenous to bank's capital and leverage. Compared to the conventional debt contract with a predetermined return, we find that an Islamic financial contract amplifies shocks as much as conventional financial contracts do, if not to a greater extent. The impacts on entrepreneurs' and banks' leverage, however, depend largely on the source of the shock and are opposite to those observed under conventional debt contract. Whereas favorable aggregate supply and monetary shocks increase the overall leverage, shocks favorably hitting preference and marginal efficiency of investment reduce the leverage. The underlying mechanism is the shock-shifting ex post payoff distribution between creditors and debtors that shapes the cost of the external finance and, thus, leverage.
机译:本文旨在通过利用金融加速器的新凯恩斯主义宏观经济模型来考察伊斯兰金融合同的稳定方面。该模型考虑到伊斯兰银行资产和负债方面的共同责任,原则上类似于资产方面的两级Mudarabah融资和负债方面的利润共享投资帐户。隐含的最佳伊斯兰金融合同认为,企业家与银行之间的收益分配取决于企业家的杠杆作用的宏观经济环境,而银行与投资者之间的收益分配取决于银行的资本和杠杆作用。与具有预定收益的常规债务合同相比,我们发现,伊斯兰金融合同与传统金融合同相比,其冲击程度甚至更大。但是,对企业家和银行杠杆的影响很大程度上取决于冲击的来源,与传统债务合同所观察到的相反。有利的总供给和货币冲击增加了总体杠杆率,而冲击有利地打击了偏好,而投资的边际效率降低了杠杆率。潜在的机制是债权人和债务人之间事后转移的震撼性分配,它决定了外部融资的成本并因此影响了杠杆。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号