首页> 外文期刊>Ecological management & restoration >Efficacy of intervention to relieve nest box competition for Orange-bellied Parrot Neophema chrysogaster
【24h】

Efficacy of intervention to relieve nest box competition for Orange-bellied Parrot Neophema chrysogaster

机译:橙腹鹦鹉Neophema chrysogaster的干预对减轻巢箱竞争的功效

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We use an experimental approach to evaluate the effectiveness of removing nests of a dominant competitor to create vacant nest boxes for a critically endangered parrot. We compared the number of times that Tree Martin (Petrochelidon nigricans - the dominant competitor at nest boxes) perched at or entered nest boxes intended for Orange-bellied Parrot (Neophema chrysogaster - the subordinate nest competitor) over three time periods (before, immediately after and one week after experimental nest destruction). In the before period, rates of nest attendance by martins in treatment and control nests were not explained by treatment group. After experimental nest destruction, total attendance at boxes by martins rose to a mean of 6.1 visits over three five-minute surveys in the treatment group, compared with 3.3 visits at control boxes. Within individual surveys, martins visited treatment boxes 4.4 times per survey one week after nest destruction, compared with only 1.6 visits in the control group. Martins in the treatment group rapidly rebuilt their nests and laid replacement clutches, and within a week, all boxes were reoccupied. Nest destruction did not increase nesting opportunities for the parrot, and increased vigilance of the dominant competitor may in fact reduce nesting opportunities in nearby boxes. Our study suggests that removing martin nests is an ineffective management action for alleviating nest competition for this parrot.
机译:我们使用一种实验方法来评估去除主要竞争对手的巢穴以为极度濒临灭绝的鹦鹉创建空巢箱的有效性。我们比较了三个时期(之前,之后,之后)Tree Martin(Petrochelidon nigricans-在巢箱中的主要竞争者)栖息或进入用于橙腹鹦鹉(Neophema chrysogaster-下级鸟巢竞争者)的巢箱的次数。并在实验巢破坏后一周内进行)。在之前的时期,治疗组和对照组的巢ins出席率均未按治疗组进行解释。在实验性破坏巢穴后,在治疗组进行的三次五分钟调查中,马丁人在盒子上的总出勤率平均上升到6.1次,而对照组中只有3.3次。在个别调查中,,巢破坏后一周,马丁斯每次调查都对治疗箱进行了4.4次访问,而对照组只有1.6次。治疗组中的马丁斯迅速重建了巢穴,放下了备用的离合器,一周之内,所有的箱子都被重新占用了。筑巢破坏并没有增加鹦鹉的筑巢机会,而对主要竞争者提高警惕实际上可能会减少附近盒子中的筑巢机会。我们的研究表明,去除马丁巢对减轻这种鹦鹉的巢竞争是无效的管理措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号