首页> 外文期刊>Ecological management & restoration >Landcare in Australia and Germany: comparing structures and policies for community engagement in natural resource management
【24h】

Landcare in Australia and Germany: comparing structures and policies for community engagement in natural resource management

机译:澳大利亚和德国的土地保育:比较社区参与自然资源管理的结构和政策

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

'Landcare' is a specific form of community-based natural resource management (CBNRM) that is expanding across the world. Although Landcare is widely understood to have originated in Australia in the late 1980s, a similar concept, Landschaftspflege, developed in Germany much earlier, with Landschaftspflegeverbande, or 'Landcare Groups', having been established around the same time. The existence of other forms of CBNRM around the world diminishes Australian Landcare's claims to uniqueness but provides a richer context for further refinements of CBNRM models. Based on 57 qualitative key informant interviews and a thorough document analysis, this paper compares Landcare in Australia with Germany. A key finding is that there are substantial similarities but also significant differences. As a result of recent changes, it is likely that the differences will diminish over time. Recommendations for the design of initiatives to promote community involvement in environmental management are provided as are considerations for Landcare as it expands internationally.
机译:“土地保育”是一种以社区为基础的自然资源管理(CBNRM)的特定形式,正在全球范围内扩展。尽管人们普遍认为Landcare起源于1980年代后期,但类似的概念Landschaftspflege却在德国发展得更早了,而Landschaftspflegeverbande或“ Landcare Groups”也同时成立了。世界各地还存在其他形式的CBNRM,这减少了澳大利亚土地保护局对独特性的主张,但为进一步完善CBNRM模型提供了更丰富的背景。基于对57位主要信息提供者的定性访谈和详尽的文档分析,本文对澳大利亚和德国的Landcare进行了比较。一个关键的发现是既有实质性的相似之处,也有重大的差异。由于最近的变化,差异可能会随着时间的流逝而减小。提出了有关设计方案的建议,以促进社区参与环境管理,并且随着土地保护国际化的发展,也提出了对土地保护的考虑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号