...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecological indicators >A new integrative indicator to assess crop genetic diversity? About the publication by Bonneuil et al. (2012), published in Ecological Indicators 23, 280-289
【24h】

A new integrative indicator to assess crop genetic diversity? About the publication by Bonneuil et al. (2012), published in Ecological Indicators 23, 280-289

机译:新的综合指标评估作物遗传多样性?关于Bonneuil等人的出版物。 (2012年),发表于生态指标23,280-289

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To study the change of genetic diversity in wheat cultivated varieties over the French territory from the end of the nineteenth century to 2006, Bonneuil et al. (2012) defined and used an indicator to account for the spatial share of the different varieties. However, we found two errors in the implementation of this indicator. The first error is to combine an estimation of weighted genetic diversity among populations with the unweighted Nei coefficient of differentiation among populations (G(ST)). Furthermore, the authors considered, what could be justified, that population varieties cultivated at the end of the nineteenth century and the beginning of the twentieth century, i.e. land races, have now lost their within population diversity due to the process of their maintenance. Then, to retrieve the total genetic diversity present at the period when land races were cultivated, they proposed to add an estimate of the within-variety diversity to the current estimate of the between-variety diversity, which they considered as equal to Nei's parameter (D-ST) of genetic differentiation between populations. This is the second and main error. Indeed, we show that, when each population is reduced to one single line, the expectation of the between-line genetic diversity is not equal to the D-ST at the level of the heterogeneous populations but is near to their total gene diversity. The result of the authors' computation is then a high overestimation of genetic diversity for the period where land races were cultivated. The consequence of the two main errors is that the proposed indicator is not scientifically based and its application leads to erroneous conclusions.
机译:从十九世纪末到2006年,鲍威等人,从十九世纪末,研究了法国领土遗传多样性的变化。 (2012)定义并使用指标,以考虑不同品种的空间份额。但是,我们在执行此指标时发现了两个错误。第一个误差是将群体中的加权遗传多样性估计与群体中的未加权NEI分化系数相结合(G(ST))。此外,作者认为,可能是合理的,即十九世纪末和二十世纪初,即土地比赛,现在遭遇了由于其维护的过程而损失了人口多样性。然后,为了检索培养土地种群的时期存在的总遗传多样性,他们提议增加各种多样性的估计,以对各种多样性之间的当前估计,它们认为等于NEI参数(群体遗传分化的D-ST。这是第二个和主要错误。实际上,我们表明,当每种人口减少到一个单线时,线路之间的期望不等于异质群体水平的D-ST,但近于它们的总基因多样性。作者计算的结果是耕种土地种群的期间的遗传多样性的高度高度估计。这两个主要错误的结果是,所提出的指标并非科学地基于科学,其应用导致错误的结论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号