...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecological indicators >Ecosystem service relationships: Formation and recommended approaches from a systematic review
【24h】

Ecosystem service relationships: Formation and recommended approaches from a systematic review

机译:生态系统服务关系:系统回顾的形成和建议的方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Ecosystem services interact and can form neural, synergic, and trade-off relationships with each other. Current studies of ecosystem service relationships have focused more on quantification without analyzing the driver of these interactions. Here, we proposed a qualitative method based on the number of shared optimal ecosystem attributes among services to study the possible driver of ecosystem service relationships and applied it to five ecosystem services (erosion control, water yield, air quality regulation, cooling effect, and carbon sequestration) as examples. The optimal approach of three categories of ecosystem attributes, namely spatial configuration, shape and size, and structure, for these five ecosystem services was summarized by systematically reviewing 116 related studies. Results suggested that synergic relationships were more likely to occur among erosion control, air quality regulation, and cooling effect since they had high numbers of shared optimal ecosystem attributes. A high possibility of trade-off relationships was found between carbon sequestration, cooling effect, and air quality regulation due to the relatively high number of contrary optimal ecosystem attributes they shared. Validation from previous studies supported these findings. The optimal attributes from this method might also provide general guidance for designing landscapes that aim to provide additional, diverse ecosystem services.
机译:生态系统服务相互影响,可以彼此形成神经,协同和权衡关系。当前对生态系统服务关系的研究更多地集中在量化上,而没有分析这些相互作用的驱动力。在此,我们提出了一种基于服务之间共享的最佳生态系统属性数量的定性方法,以研究生态系统服务关系的可能驱动因素,并将其应用于五种生态系统服务(侵蚀控制,水产量,空气质量调节,冷却效果和碳排放)隔离)作为示例。通过系统地回顾116项相关研究,总结了这五种生态系统服务的三类生态系统属性的最佳方法,即空间配置,形状和大小以及结构。结果表明,在侵蚀控制,空气质量调节和降温效果之间更可能出现协同关系,因为它们具有大量共享的最佳生态系统属性。由于碳固存,冷却效果和空气质量调节之间存在大量相反的最佳生态系统属性,因此它们之间极有可能在取舍之间取得平衡。先前研究的验证支持了这些发现。这种方法的最佳属性也可能为设计景观提供一般指导,这些景观旨在提供额外的多样化生态系统服务。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Ecological indicators》 |2019年第4期|1-11|共11页
  • 作者

    Wu Shuyao; Li Shuangcheng;

  • 作者单位

    Peking Univ, Coll Urban & Environm Sci, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China|Peking Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Earth Surface Proc, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China;

    Peking Univ, Coll Urban & Environm Sci, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China|Peking Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Earth Surface Proc, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Ecosystem services; Synergy; Trade-off; Ecosystem attributes; Driver; Systematic review;

    机译:生态系统服务;协同作用;权衡;生态系统属性;驱动因素;系统评价;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号