首页> 外文期刊>Ecological indicators >Estimating green biomass ratio with remote sensing in arid grasslands
【24h】

Estimating green biomass ratio with remote sensing in arid grasslands

机译:干旱草原遥感绿色生物量比估算

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

It is difficult to estimate green biomass ratio (GBR), the ratio of green aboveground biomass to total aboveground biomass, using common broad-band vegetation indices in arid grasslands due to similar spectral features between bare soil and non-photosynthetic vegetation in near-infrared (NIR) and visible bands. We evaluated the performance of the broad-band RVI (ratio vegetation index), NDVI (normalized difference vegetation index), SAVI (soil-adjusted vegetation index), MSAVI (modified soil-adjusted vegetation index), OSAVI (optimized soil adjusted vegetation index), NDVIgreen (green normalized difference vegetation index), CI (canopy index), and NCI (normalized canopy index) for GBR estimation in the desert steppe of Inner Mongolia, China. We also explored best narrow-band hyperspectral vegetation indices for GBR estimation using hyperspectral remotely sensed data and GBR measurements during 2009 and 2010 growing seasons in the desert steppe. Broad-band vegetation indices were not suitable for GBR estimation. The best narrow-band vegetation indices used reflectance at 2069 and 2042 nm; particular 1.5 x (R-2069 - R-2042)/(R-2069 + R-2042 + 0.5). The index could partially overcome the influence of bare soil cover. It explained 68% of the variance of GBR and dramatically improved GBR estimation accuracy over common broad-band indices. More importantly, the accuracy was not affected by varying bare soil cover. Nevertheless, caution is required for the index application within varying growing seasons. The development of this index is an important resource for future spectral sensors that will permit GBR monitoring at regional scales in arid grasslands. Our results show that remote imagery can monitor GBR in the desert steppe and potentially in many arid grasslands.
机译:由于干旱土壤中裸露土壤和非光合植被的光谱特征相似,因此在干旱草原上使用常见的宽带植被指数很难估算绿色生物量比率(GBR),即绿色地上生物量与地上总生物量的比率。 (NIR)和可见波段。我们评估了宽带RVI(比率植被指数),NDVI(归一化差异植被指数),SAVI(土壤校正后的植被指数),MSAVI(改良土壤校正后的植被指数),OSAVI(优化土壤校正后的植被指数)的性能),NDVIgreen(绿色归一化植被指数),CI(冠层指数)和NCI(归一化冠层指数)用于估算内蒙古沙漠草原的GBR。我们还使用高光谱遥感数据和沙漠草原2009年和2010年生长季的GBR测量值,探索了用于GBR估计的最佳窄带高光谱植被指数。宽带植被指数不适合GBR估算。最佳的窄带植被指数使用2069和2042 nm处的反射率。特别是1.5 x(R-2069-R-2042)/(R-2069 + R-2042 + 0.5)。该指数可以部分克服裸土覆盖的影响。它解释了GBR的68%的方差,并显着提高了常见宽带指标上的GBR估算精度。更重要的是,精度不受变化的裸土覆盖率的影响。但是,在不同的生长季节中使用该指数时需要谨慎。该指数的发展是未来光谱传感器的重要资源,它将使干旱草原地区范围内的GBR监测成为可能。我们的结果表明,远程影像可以监测沙漠草原以及许多干旱草原中的GBR。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号