首页> 外文期刊>Ecological indicators >Can forest fragmentation and configuration work as indicators of human-wildlife conflict? Evidences from human death and injury by wildlife attacks in Nepal
【24h】

Can forest fragmentation and configuration work as indicators of human-wildlife conflict? Evidences from human death and injury by wildlife attacks in Nepal

机译:森林碎片化和配置是否可以作为人类与野生生物冲突的指标?尼泊尔野生动植物袭击造成的人命伤亡证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Fragmented forests and heterogeneous landscapes are likely to have less natural vegetation and smaller core areas, a low degree of landscape connectivity, high prevalence of anthropogenic edges, and high landscape heterogeneity, which may alter at varying degrees behavior of wildlife species such as attacks on humans. We evaluated whether or not forest fragmentation (e.g. shape, size and distribution of forest patches measured as landscape shape index, effective mesh size, and landscape heterogeneity), habitats (proportion of bush and grassland, distance to water sources), and human disturbances (human population density) have a significant relationship with frequencies of human deaths and injuries by Bengal tiger (Panthera tigris tigris), common leopard (Panthera pardus), one-horned rhinoceros (Rhinoceros.unicornis) and Asiatic elephant (Elephas maxims). Data on human injury and death were obtained from a national survey over five years (2010-2014). The relationship between wildlife attacks and landscape attributes were investigated using a zero-inflated Poisson regression model. Attacks by tigers were significantly and positively associated with forest fragmentation (effective mesh size which is high in a landscape consisting of disconnected small patches). Attacks by common leopards were strongly positively related with landscape heterogeneity, and negatively related to the proportion of bush and grassland. Attacks by one-horned rhinoceros were positively significantly related to the distance to water sources, and proportion of bush and grassland in the landscape. Attacks by elephants were strongly and positively associated with the forest fragmentation (landscape shape index, which increases as patches in the landscapes becomes disaggregated). These results suggest that forest fragmentation is inevitably a critical driver of human wildlife conflicts, although the extent of effects varies depending on species specific habitat requirements.
机译:零散的森林和异质景观可能具有较少的自然植被和较小的核心区域,较低的景观连通性,较高的人为边缘患病率和较高的景观异质性,它们可能在不同程度上改变野生生物物种的行为,例如对人类的攻击。我们评估了森林破碎化(例如,以景观形状指数,有效网格尺寸和景观异质性衡量的森林斑块的形状,大小和分布),栖息地(灌木丛和草地的比例,与水源的距离)和人为干扰(人口密度)与孟加拉虎(Panthera tigris tigris),普通豹(Panthera pardus),单角犀牛(Rhinoceros.unicornis)和亚洲象(Elephas maxims)的死亡和受伤频率密切相关。有关人身伤害和死亡的数据来自五年(2010-2014年)的全国调查。使用零膨胀的Poisson回归模型研究了野生动植物袭击与景观属性之间的关系。老虎的袭击与森林破碎成显着正相关(有效的网格尺寸在不连贯的小斑块组成的景观中很大)。普通豹子的袭击与景观异质性正相关,与灌木和草地的比例负相关。单角犀牛的袭击与距水源的距离以及景观中灌木丛和草地的比例呈显着正相关。大象的袭击与森林破碎化密切相关(景观形状指数随着景观斑块的分解而增加)。这些结果表明,森林碎片化不可避免地是人类野生动植物冲突的关键驱动力,尽管影响的程度取决于物种特定的栖息地要求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号