首页> 外文期刊>Ecological indicators >Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process to identify parameter weights for developing a water quality index
【24h】

Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process to identify parameter weights for developing a water quality index

机译:使用层次分析法确定参数权重以建立水质指数

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

One of the most common approaches used to evaluate the state of water quality in a water body is through the use of water quality indices (WQIs). This paper presents one of the most important steps in the development of a WQI, which is that of establishing the weights of the water quality parameters. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was employed to calculate weights based on 13 selected parameters from within 7 water quality groupings for rivers in West Java, Indonesia. Thus, two AHP models were employed in this study, the first had 13 pairwise questionnaires to be compared (individual form) and the second model had 7 comparisons (group form). A pool of respondents from related stakeholders with different backgrounds in West Java was surveyed to obtain their judgement independently. In the first AHP model, both chemical oxygen demand (weights in the range 0.102-0.185) and dissolved oxygen (weights in the range 0.103-0.164) consistently received relatively high weights, compared to other water quality parameters. Meanwhile, in the second model, oxygen depletion (weights in the range 0.160-0.233) and microbiology (weights in the range 0.098-0.249) had high weights. Thus, both models estimated relatively high weights for COD, DO and FC. However, considering that the second AHP model. can provide individual weights as well as weights of parameter groupings, this model was preferred in this study. Therefore the results of the second AHP model will be used for the remaining steps in the development of the West Java WQI in the future. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:用于评估水体中水质状态的最常见方法之一是使用水质指数(WQI)。本文介绍了开发WQI的最重要步骤之一,即确定水质参数权重的步骤。基于印度尼西亚西爪哇省河流的7种水质分组中的13个选定参数,采用了层次分析法(AHP)来计算权重。因此,本研究采用了两个AHP模型,第一个模型有13个成对的问卷进行比较(个人形式),第二个模型有7个比较(小组形式)。对来自西爪哇不同背景的相关利益相关者的调查对象进行了调查,以独立获得其判断。在第一个AHP模型中,与其他水质参数相比,化学需氧量(重量在0.102-0.185范围内)和溶解氧(重量在0.103-0.164范围内)都始终获得相对较高的重量。同时,在第二种模型中,耗氧量(重量在0.160-0.233范围内)和微生物学(重量在0.098-0.249范围内)具有较高的重量。因此,两个模型都估计了COD,DO和FC的权重较高。但是,考虑到第二个AHP模型。可以提供单个权重以及参数分组的权重,此模型在本研究中是首选。因此,第二个AHP模型的结果将用于将来开发West Java WQI的其余步骤。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Ecological indicators》 |2017年第4期|220-233|共14页
  • 作者单位

    Victoria Univ, Coll Engn & Sci, POB 14428, Melbourne, Vic 8001, Australia|West Java Environm Protect Agcy, Jl Naripan 25 Bandung, Bandung 40111, Indonesia;

    Victoria Univ, Coll Engn & Sci, POB 14428, Melbourne, Vic 8001, Australia|Victoria Univ, Inst Sustainabil & Innovat, POB 14428, Melbourne, Vic 8001, Australia;

    Victoria Univ, Coll Engn & Sci, POB 14428, Melbourne, Vic 8001, Australia|Victoria Univ, Inst Sustainabil & Innovat, POB 14428, Melbourne, Vic 8001, Australia;

    Victoria Univ, Coll Engn & Sci, POB 14428, Melbourne, Vic 8001, Australia|Victoria Univ, Inst Sustainabil & Innovat, POB 14428, Melbourne, Vic 8001, Australia;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    AHP; Weights; WQIs; Water quality parameters; West java;

    机译:层次分析法;重量;水质指数;水质参数;西爪哇;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 03:45:17

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号