...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecological Economics >Does 'better' discounting lead to 'worse' outcomes in long-run decisions? The dilemma of hyperbolic discounting
【24h】

Does 'better' discounting lead to 'worse' outcomes in long-run decisions? The dilemma of hyperbolic discounting

机译:在长期决策中,“更好的”折扣会导致“更糟糕的”结果吗?双曲贴现的困境

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The shortcomings of conventional discounting, especially in the context of long-run environmental problems, have been extensively discussed in the literature. Recently, hyperbolic discounting, i. e. discounting at declining instead of constant discount rates, has attracted a lot of interest among both scientists and politicians. Although there are compelling arguments for employing hyperbolic discounting, there are also pitfalls, which have to be pointed out. In this paper I show that the problem of time-inconsistency, an inherent characteristics of hyperbolic discounting, leads to a potential clash between economic efficiency and intergenerational equity. As an example, I refer to the weak progress in the controlling of greenhouse gas emissions under the Kyoto protocol. As the problem of time-inconsistency cannot be solved on economic grounds alone, there is a need for an intergenerational moral commitment.
机译:常规折价的缺点,特别是在长期环境问题的背景下,已在文献中广泛讨论。最近,双曲线贴现,即。 e。下降而不是恒定的折现率引起了科学家和政治家的极大兴趣。尽管存在使用双曲线折扣的令人信服的论点,但也存在一些陷阱,必须指出。在本文中,我证明了时间不一致的问题是双曲线贴现的固有特征,导致经济效率与代际公平之间的潜在冲突。例如,我指的是在《京都议定书》之下控制温室气体排放方面进展缓慢。由于不能单凭经济理由解决时间不一致的问题,因此需要代际道德承诺。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号