...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecological Economics >Motivation for conservation: Assessing integrated conservation and development projects and payments for environmental services in La Sepultura Biosphere Reserve, Chiapas, Mexico
【24h】

Motivation for conservation: Assessing integrated conservation and development projects and payments for environmental services in La Sepultura Biosphere Reserve, Chiapas, Mexico

机译:保护动机:墨西哥恰帕斯州拉塞普图拉生物圈保护区评估综合保护和开发项目以及环境服务付款

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In order to achieve conservation and development, direct strategies, such as Payments for Environmental Services (PES), have been claimed to be potentially more effective than indirect strategies, like Integrated Conservation and Development Projects (ICDPs). However, PES have raised some concerns on the commodification of nature and the potential replacement of non-chrematistic forms of valuing ecosystems. This article evaluates PES and ICDPs in La Sepultura Biosphere Reserve, Mexico, by analyzing the programs' fund allocation, examining conservation perceptions based on 731 structured interviews and presenting a detailed assessment of ICDP/PES preferences in a community with the longest participation in both schemes. People receiving PES tend to make the future of conservation contingent on monetary and utilitarian reasons, this preference increasing with the number of years receiving PES. These are preferred for their directness and short-term results, although raising concerns about the little social capital they generate. ICDPs are appreciated for arising environmental awareness, being linked with long term conservation, productive capacity and social capital building. Negative perceptions of ICDPs are related to past economic failures. Our results suggest that the real issue is not PES vs. ICDPs but how to combine them to find the proper sequence while reinforcing intrinsic value-based attitudes.
机译:为了实现保护和发展,据称直接战略(例如环境服务付款(PES))比间接战略(例如综合保护和发展项目(ICDP))更有效。但是,生态系统服务付费引起了人们对自然商品化以及非传统形式的珍贵生态系统的潜在替代的关注。本文通过分析计划的资金分配,基于731次结构化访谈审查了保护意识并提出了对两种方案参与时间最长的社区对ICDP / PES偏好的详细评估,对墨西哥La Sepultura生物圈保护区的PES和ICDP进行了评估。 。接受PES的人们往往会出于金钱和功利性的原因而决定保护的未来,而随着使用PES的年限的增加,这种偏好也会增加。尽管它们引起的社会资本很少,但由于它们的直接性和短期效果,它们是优选的。 ICDP因其不断提高的环保意识,与长期的保护,生产能力和社会资本的建立而受到赞赏。对ICDP的负面看法与过去的经济失败有关。我们的结果表明,真正的问题不是PES与ICDP,而是如何结合它们以找到适当的顺序,同时加强基于内在价值的态度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号