...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecological Economics >Framed field experiment on resource scarcity & extraction: Path-dependent generosity within sequential water appropriation
【24h】

Framed field experiment on resource scarcity & extraction: Path-dependent generosity within sequential water appropriation

机译:关于资源稀缺和开采的框架野外试验:连续水分配中与路径有关的慷慨

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

How one treats others is important within collective action. We ask if resource scarcity in the past, due to its effects upon past behaviors, influences current other-regarding behaviors. Contrasting theories and empirical findings on scarcity motivate our framed field experiment. Participants are rural Colombian farmers who have experienced scarcity of water within irrigation. We randomly assign participants to groups and places on group canals. Places order extraction decisions. Our treatments are sequences of scarcities: 'from lower to higher resources' involves four rounds each of 20, 60, then 100 units of water; from higher to lower resources' reverses the ordering. We find that upstream farmers extract more, but a lower share, when facing higher resources. Further they take a larger share of higher resources when they faced lower resources in earlier rounds (relative to when facing higher resources initially). That is inconsistent with leading models of responses to scarcity which focus upon one's own gain. It is consistent with lowering one's weight on others to, for instance, rationalize having left them little. Our results suggest that facing higher scarcity can erode the bases for collective actions. For establishing new institutions, timing relative to scarcity could affect the probability of success. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:在集体行动中,一个人如何对待他人很重要。我们询问过去的资源稀缺性是否会由于其对过去行为的影响而影响当前其他方面的行为。稀缺性的相反理论和实证研究结果激发了我们的框架实地试验。参与者是哥伦比亚农村的农民,他们在灌溉过程中遇到缺水的情况。我们将参与者随机分配到各组以及在各组运河上的位置。下订单提取决策。我们的处理工作是稀缺性的:“从低到高的资源”涉及四轮,分别是20轮,60轮,然后是100单位水;从较高资源到较低资源的顺序相反。我们发现,面对更高的资源,上游农民收获更多,但份额却更低。此外,当他们在较早的回合中面对较低的资源时(相对于最初面对较高的资源时),他们会获得较高资源的更大份额。这与针对稀缺性的主要应对模式不一致,后者侧重于自己的收益。这与减轻别人的负担,例如合理化留给别人的东西相吻合。我们的结果表明,面对更高的稀缺性可能侵蚀集体行动的基础。对于建立新机构,相对于稀缺性的时机可能会影响成功的可能性。 (C)2015 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Ecological Economics》 |2015年第12期|416-429|共14页
  • 作者单位

    Duke Univ, Sanford Sch Publ Policy, Durham, NC 27708 USA;

    Univ Los Andes, Fac Adm, Bogota, Colombia;

    Pontificia Univ Javeriana, Sch Rural & Environm Studies, Bogota, Colombia;

    Interamer Dev Bank, Consultant Off Evaluat & Oversight, Washington, DC USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号