...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecological Economics >Notes from the field: Lessons learned from using ecosystem service approaches to inform real-world decisions
【24h】

Notes from the field: Lessons learned from using ecosystem service approaches to inform real-world decisions

机译:现场说明:使用生态系统服务方法为现实决策提供信息的经验教训

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

While there have been rapid advances in assessments of biodiversity and ecosystem services (BES), a critical remaining challenge is how to move from scientific knowledge to real-world decision making. We offer 6 lessons from our experiences applying new approaches and tools for quantifying BES in 20 pilot demonstrations: (1) Applying a BES approach is most effective in leading to policy change as part of an iterative science-policy process; (2) simple ecological production function models have been useful in a diverse set of decision contexts, across abroad range of biophysical, social, and governance systems. Key limitations of simple models arise at very small scales, and in predicting specific future BES values; (3) training local experts in the approaches and tools is important for building local capacity, ownership, trust, and long-term success; (4) decision makers and stake-holders prefer to use a variety of BES value metrics, not only monetary values; (5) an important science gap exists in linking changes in BES to changes in livelihoods, health, cultural values, and other metrics of human wellbeing; and (6) communicating uncertainty in useful and transparent ways remains challenging. 2013 The Authors. (C) Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:尽管在评估生物多样性和生态系统服务(BES)方面取得了迅速的进展,但仍然存在的关键挑战是如何从科学知识转向现实世界的决策。我们从20种试点示范中应用新方法和量化BES的工具的经验中汲取了6个教训:(1)在迭代的科学政策过程中,应用BES方法最有效地导致政策改变; (2)简单的生态生产功能模型在国外的一系列生物物理,社会和治理系统的各种决策环境中都非常有用。简单模型的主要局限性是在很小的规模上出现,并且在预测未来特定的BES值时会出现; (3)对本地专家进行方法和工具方面的培训对于建立本地能力,所有权,信任和长期成功至关重要; (4)决策者和利益相关者更喜欢使用各种BES价值指标,而不仅仅是货币价值。 (5)在将BES的变化与生计,健康,文化价值以及其他人类福祉的变化联系起来时,存在重大的科学空白; (6)以有效和透明的方式传达不确定性仍然具有挑战性。 2013作者。 (C)Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Ecological Economics》 |2015年第7期|11-21|共11页
  • 作者单位

    Univ Washington, Sch Environm & Forest Sci, Nat Capital Project, Stanford Univ,Dept Biol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA|Univ Washington, Sch Environm & Forest Sci, Stanford Univ, Woods Inst Environm, Seattle, WA 98195 USA;

    World Wildlife Fund, WWF US, Conservat Sci Program, Washington, DC 20037 USA|WWF UK, Godalming GU7 1XR, Surrey, England;

    Nature Conservancy, Calif Program, San Francisco, CA 94105 USA;

    Univ Washington, Sch Environm & Forest Sci, Nat Capital Project, Stanford Univ,Dept Biol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA|Univ Washington, Sch Environm & Forest Sci, Stanford Univ, Woods Inst Environm, Seattle, WA 98195 USA;

    Stanford Univ, Ctr Conservat Biol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA|Stanford Univ, Nat Capital Project, Dept Biol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA|Stanford Univ, Woods Inst Environm, Stanford, CA 94305 USA;

    Nature Conservancy, Seattle, WA 98105 USA;

    Univ Minnesota, Dept Appl Econ, St Paul, MN 55108 USA|Univ Minnesota, Dept Ecol Evolut & Behav, St Paul, MN 55108 USA;

    Univ Vermont, Gund Inst Ecol Econ, Burlington, VT 05405 USA;

    World Wildlife Fund, WWF US, Conservat Sci Program, Washington, DC 20037 USA;

    Univ Washington, Sch Environm & Forest Sci, Nat Capital Project, Stanford Univ,Dept Biol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA|Univ Washington, Sch Environm & Forest Sci, Stanford Univ, Woods Inst Environm, Seattle, WA 98195 USA;

    Univ British Columbia, Dept Zool, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Ecosystem services; Human development and conservation; Spatial planning; PES; Decision support;

    机译:生态系统服务;人类发展与保护;空间规划;PES;决策支持;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号