首页> 外文期刊>Ecological Economics >Integrating ecology and economics in understanding responses in securing land -use externalities internalization in water catchments
【24h】

Integrating ecology and economics in understanding responses in securing land -use externalities internalization in water catchments

机译:将生态学和经济学相结合,以理解对确保集水区土地利用外部性内部化的应对措施

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Securing sustainable upstream land-use externalities internalization in developing countries' water catchments continues to be a serious challenge. Uluguru water catchment in Tanzania presents a compelling case for analysis. The catchment is currently under downstream-upstream conservation subsidy arrangement. However, lack of information on the long-term impacts of the approach on the functioning and distribution of benefits threatens its sustainability. Based on system dynamics framework, this study developed an integrated ecological-economic model to evaluate the long-term impacts of this arrangement on the functioning and distribution of benefits. The model was also used to compare the arrangement with other economic instruments in the same respect. Simulation results indicate that the scheme has a potential of securing conservation goals without compromising upstream well-being. Taxing crop inputs and outputs also has a potential securing conservation goal, but at the expense of upstream well-being. Tax cuts on inputs to tree fruit and basic domestic goods also secure conservation goals without compromising upstream well-being. These results show that a downstream-upstream subsidy scheme is better for achieving upstream land use externalities internalization without compromising distribution of benefits among beneficiaries and well-being of upstream land holders than taxing crop inputs and outputs. (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier B.V.
机译:确保发展中国家集水区可持续的上游土地利用外部性内部化仍然是一个严峻的挑战。坦桑尼亚的乌鲁古鲁集水区为分析提供了令人信服的案例。该流域目前处于下游上游保护补贴安排之下。但是,缺乏有关该方法对福利的运作和分配的长期影响的信息,威胁到其可持续性。在系统动力学框架的基础上,本研究开发了一个综合的生态经济模型,以评估这种安排对收益的功能和分配的长期影响。该模型还用于比较该安排与同一方面的其他经济工具。仿真结果表明,该方案具有确保保护目标而不损害上游福利的潜力。对作物的投入和产出征税也有确保保护的潜在目标,但要以牺牲上游福祉为代价。对果树和基本家庭产品的投入进行减税也可以确保保护目标,同时又不损害上游福利。这些结果表明,与向农作物的投入和产出征税相比,下游上游补贴方案更有利于实现上游土地利用外部性的内部化,而又不损害受益人之间的利益分配和上游土地所有者的福祉。 (C)2015由Elsevier B.V.发布

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号