首页> 外文期刊>Ecological Economics >Circular economy, degrowth and green growth as pathways for research on sustainable development goals: A global analysis and future agenda
【24h】

Circular economy, degrowth and green growth as pathways for research on sustainable development goals: A global analysis and future agenda

机译:循环经济,降解和绿色增长作为可持续发展目标研究的途径:全球分析和未来议程

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Using bibliometric techniques, we evaluate the contribution of current academic research to the advancement of sustainable development agenda as expressed in the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) targets . We focus on four knowledge domains highly relevant to the ethos of sustainable development, each with a distinct approach, to finding a balance between ecological and economic systems when it comes to development: ?Circular Economy? (CE), ?Degrowth? (DG), Green Growth? (GG), and research specifically addressing sustainable development goals that we refer to as ?SDG Research? (SDGR). We evaluate two dimensions: scope ? the extent to which the full range of UN Sustainable Develpment (SD) Agenda 2030 topics expressed in targets and indicators for each SDG are explored; and intensity- the quantity of research focusing on each SDG. Our analysis demonstrates that the four knowledge domains examined: CE, DG, GG and the emerging domain labelled SDGR, have made important contributions to research related with the 17 UN SDGs. However, these contributions are heterogeneous with important differences according to the SDGs. We find that academic research does not fully align with the policy agenda, identifying several gaps. The disparate coverage of SDGs priorities by academics may compromise the progress and implementation of the UN Sustainable Development Agenda 2030.
机译:使用圣学算法,我们评估当前学术研究对可持续发展目标(SDGS)目标表达的可持续发展议程的进步。我们专注于与可持续发展的民主高度相关的四个知识域,每个知识域都具有独特的方法,在发展方面发展生态和经济系统之间的平衡:?循环经济? (CE),?Degrowth? (DG),绿色生长? (GG),并研究专门解决我们称为SDG Research的可持续发展目标? (SDGR)。我们评估两个维度:范围?探讨了每个SDG的目标和指标中表达的联合国可持续发展(SD)议程2030主题的全部范围;和强度 - 关注每个SDG的研究数量。我们的分析表明,审查了四个知识域:CE,DG,GG和标有SDGR的新兴域,对与17个联合国SDGS相关的研究作出了重要贡献。然而,这些贡献是异构的,根据SDGS,具有重要差异。我们发现学术研究并没有与政策议程完全一致,识别几个差距。学术界的SDGS优先事​​项的不同覆盖可能会损害联合国可持续发展议程2030的进展和实施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号