...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecological Economics >Payments for Environmental Services and Motivation Crowding: Towards a Conceptual Framework
【24h】

Payments for Environmental Services and Motivation Crowding: Towards a Conceptual Framework

机译:为环境服务和激励人群付费:建立一个概念框架

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Research on Payments for Environmental Services has only recently started to pay attention to motivation "crowding", i.e. the effect that such rewards might have on either strengthening (crowding-in) or weakening (crowding-out) participants' intrinsic motivations to protect and sustainably manage natural ecosystems. In this Introduction to the special issue Crowding-out or crowding-in? Behavioral and motivational responses to economic incentives for conservation, we propose a conceptual framework that maps out how PES implementation, or incentive-based conservation more broadly, might lead to motivation and behavioural change, drawing on theoretical insights and empirical evidence from behavioural economics and social psychology. We also explain how PES design and implementation factors, such as payment type, communication and verbal rewards, inclusive and participatory decision-making, and monitoring and sanctioning procedures, might harm or enhance intrinsic motivations. We suggest that motivation crowding depends on how these policy features are perceived by and affect an individual's need for satisfaction, modulated in turn by the stimulation or inhibition of competence, autonomy, social and environmental relatedness. We highlight the importance of measuring these variables and their motivation and behavioural outcomes in future PES research, in order to relate psychological processes with other contextual determinants of PES social-ecological performance.
机译:关于环境服务付款的研究直到最近才开始关注动机“拥挤”,即这种奖励可能对加强(拥挤)或削弱(拥挤)参与者保护内在动机的影响。并可持续地管理自然生态系统。在此特殊问题简介中挤出还是挤出?行为和动机对保护经济激励措施的反应,我们提出了一个概念框架,该图框架借鉴了行为经济学和社会学的理论见解和经验证据,提出了生态系统服务付费的实施或更广泛地基于激励的保护可能如何导致动机和行为变化心理学。我们还解释了PES的设计和实施因素,例如付款方式,沟通和口头报酬,包容性和参与性决策以及监控和制裁程序,如何损害或增强内在动机。我们建议,动机拥挤取决于这些政策特征如何被个人感知并影响个人的满意度需求,而后者又是通过刺激或抑制能力,自主性,社会和环境相关性来调节的。我们强调在将来的PES研究中测量这些变量及其动机和行为结果的重要性,以便将心理过程与PES社会生态绩效的其他环境决定因素联系起来。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Ecological Economics》 |2019年第2期|434-443|共10页
  • 作者单位

    CIRAD, UPR Forets & Soc, Campus Int Baillarguet, F-34398 Montpellier, France|Montpellier Univ, Montpellier, France;

    Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Inst Environm Sci & Technol, ICP, ICTA, Edifici Z,Carrer Columnes,Campus UAB, E-08193 Barcelona, Cerdanyola Del, Spain;

    Inst Sustainable Dev & Int Relat IDDRI, F-75006 Paris, France;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号