首页> 外文期刊>Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics >Comparing the adequacy of alternative ground motion intensity measures for the estimation of structural responses
【24h】

Comparing the adequacy of alternative ground motion intensity measures for the estimation of structural responses

机译:比较替代地震动强度量度对结构响应估计的适当性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Practical methods for the probability-based seismic assessment of structures make use of estimates of demands produced by earthquakes of different intensities. The uncertainties associated with these estimates are highly dependent on the variable adopted as the intensity measure (IM, e.g., PGA, spectral acceleration, etc.). This generates the need to compare the efficiency of an originally adopted IM with that of a new candidate. This implies comparing the dispersion of the demand measure (DM, e.g., maximum interstorey drift ratio, ductility demand, etc.) conditional to each of the two IMs. In order to obtain the demand estimates in a conventional way, a full set of dynamic response analyses should be performed for each IM under scrutiny, i.e., multiple records scaled at several fixed values of each IM. The procedure developed here serves to accelerate this comparison avoiding the effort required to evaluate the dynamic responses of the structure for all the ground motion time histories considered every time that a new IM is adopted. For this purpose, use is made of available results of analyses performed for a different (i.e., the original) IM. Two methods are proposed: the direct method involves performing a regression of the results obtained from the original analyses, taking the candidate IM as the independent variable. The indirect method involves rebuilding the probability density function of the DM given a defined value of the candidate IM by means of the total probability theorem, using the results of the original analyses and certain data relating the two IMs. The proposed methods have been tested by application to several SDOF systems with different periods and different cyclic-response backbone curves. The conditions affecting their approximation are explored, and some criteria to improve them are identified. The procedure can also be used to determine the optimum value of a parameter to be used in a parameter-based IM.
机译:用于基于概率的结构地震评估的实用方法是利用不同强度地震产生的需求估算。与这些估计有关的不确定性高度依赖于强度测量所采用的变量(IM,例如,PGA,光谱加速度等)。这就需要将最初采用的IM的效率与新候选IM的效率进行比较。这意味着需要比较以两个IM中的每一个为条件的需求量度的离散度(DM,例如,最大层间漂移率,延展性需求等)。为了以常规方式获得需求估计,应仔细检查每个IM的全套动态响应分析,即按每个IM的几个固定值缩放的多个记录。此处开发的程序可加快此比较的速度,从而避免了每次采用新的IM时都要考虑的所有地面运动时间历史记录评估结构动力响应所需的精力。为此目的,利用了针对不同(即原始)IM执行的分析的可用结果。提出了两种方法:直接方法涉及对原始分析获得的结果进行回归,将候选IM作为自变量。间接方法涉及使用总分析定理和有关两个IM的某些数据,通过总概率定理,在给定候选IM的定义值的情况下,重建DM的概率密度函数。所提出的方法已经通过应用于具有不同周期和不同循环响应主干曲线的几个SDOF系统进行了测试。探索了影响它们近似的条件,并确定了一些改善它们的标准。该过程还可以用于确定要在基于参数的IM中使用的参数的最佳值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号