首页> 外文期刊>Doklady Earth Sciences >New SHRIMP U-Pb, Sm-Nd, and Rb-Sr Data on the Campanian Age and Genesis of Gneissic Plagiogranites of the Kol and Krutogorova Massifs (Sredinnyi Kamchatka Uplift)
【24h】

New SHRIMP U-Pb, Sm-Nd, and Rb-Sr Data on the Campanian Age and Genesis of Gneissic Plagiogranites of the Kol and Krutogorova Massifs (Sredinnyi Kamchatka Uplift)

机译:新的SHRIMP U-Pb,Sm-Nd和Rb-Sr数据关于坎波和克鲁托戈罗瓦断层(Sredinnyi Kamchatka隆起)的Campanian年龄和片麻片斜花岗岩的成因

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The southern Sredinnyi (Median) Range of the Kamchatka Peninsula hosts the large (250 x 40 km2) Sredinnyi Kamchatka uplift composed of Upper Mesozoic volcanogenic-terrigenous sequences metamorphosed to the greenschist and high-temperature amphibolite facies during the early Eocene. The uplift is characterized by the presence of many granitoid intrusions among metamorphic rocks, which form bodies variable in shapes, structural positions, inner structures, and ages. Gneissic biotite plagiogranites (gneissic granites) constituting the large Kol (KLM, >350 km~2), Icha (100 km~2), Pravaya Kolpakova (75 km~2), Krutogorova (KRM, 65 km~2), Poperechnyi (25 km~2), and smaller massifs, which were subdivided in two, the Krutogorova and Kol massifs, are traditionally thought to represent the oldest granitoid mag-matism phase. At the same time, interpretations of the relationships between granitoids and overlying metamorphic sequences are highly controversial: they are considered as intrusive stratigraphically unconform-able with the basal conglomerate member at the base of terrigenous or tectonic sequences. The differences in the structural positions of these massifs, compositions, and textural-structural features of gneissic granites are responsible for many different interpretations of their genesis and age (Proterozoic to Mesozoic), which were based on the views of the researchers on the evolution of the Sredinnyi Kamchatka uplift as a whole. The wide spectrum of Mesozoic isoch-ron K-Ar and Rb-Sr dates obtained subsequently for these rocks confirmed their belonging to two complexes: Early Cretaceous Krutogorova and Late Cretaceous Kol. According to the recent SHRIMP U-Pb investigations of zircons from several massifs of the Krutogorova Complex, its formation age is estimated to be 76-83 Ma (Campanian). The age of gneissic granites of the Kol Complex still remains unknown.
机译:堪察加半岛南部的Sredinnyi(中位数)山脉具有大型(250 x 40 km2)Sredinnyi堪察加隆起,由上中生代火山-陆源序列变质为始新世早期的绿片岩和高温闪石相。隆升的特征是在变质岩中存在许多花岗岩侵入体,形成了形状,结构位置,内部结构和年龄各不相同的物体。构成大型Kol(KLM,> 350 km〜2),Icha(100 km〜2),Pravaya Kolpakova(75 km〜2),Krutogorova(KRM,65 km〜2),Poperechnyi()的片麻岩黑云母斜长花岗岩(片麻岩花岗岩) 25 km〜2),传统上认为较小的地块细分为Krutogorova和Kol地块,代表了最早的花岗岩类岩浆作用相。同时,对花岗岩和上覆的变质层序之间关系的解释存在很大争议:它们被认为是侵入性地层学,与陆生砾岩层或构造层序的基底砾岩层不整合。这些片麻岩花岗岩的断层构造,成分和质地结构特征的差异是造成其成因和年龄(元古代至中生代)的许多不同解释的基础,这是基于研究人员对硅藻岩演化的看法。整个Sredinnyi堪察加半岛隆起。随后为这些岩石获得的中生界等时线K-Ar和Rb-Sr数据证实了它们属于两个复合体:早白垩世Krutogorova和晚白垩世Kol。根据最近的SHRIMP U-Pb对Krutogorova复杂岩体中的锆石的调查,其形成年龄估计为76-83 Ma(加拿大)。 Kol Complex片麻岩花岗岩的年龄仍然未知。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Doklady Earth Sciences》 |2014年第1期|505-511|共7页
  • 作者单位

    All-Russia Research Institute of Geology (VSEGEI), St. Petersburg, Russia;

    All-Russia Research Institute of Geology (VSEGEI), St. Petersburg, Russia,Institute of Precambrian Geology and Geochronology, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia;

    All-Russia Research Institute of Geology (VSEGEI), St. Petersburg, Russia;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号