首页> 外文期刊>District energy >In the wake of Hughes v. Talen Energy, might states turn to CHP to help meet future energy demand?
【24h】

In the wake of Hughes v. Talen Energy, might states turn to CHP to help meet future energy demand?

机译:在休斯诉塔伦能源案之后,各州是否可以求助于热电联产以帮助满足未来的能源需求?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

States have a primary role in ensuring resource adequacy within their territory at a just and reasonable cost to retail energy consumers. Over the past decade, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has approved wholesale capacity market constructs in various regions to meet resource adequacy goals, resulting in jurisdictional battles between FERC and the states. This column looks at how combined heat and power may serve as a tool states can look to in order to achieve resource adequacy goals in regions with FERC-jurisdictional capacity markets.
机译:各国在以合理和合理的成本为零售能源消费者确保其领土内的资源充足方面起着主要作用。在过去的十年中,联邦能源管理委员会已经批准了各个地区的批发能力市场建设,以满足资源充足的目标,从而导致FERC与各州之间的管辖权之争。本专栏探讨了热电联产如何作为各州可以使用的工具,以在具有FERC管辖权的市场的地区实现资源充足的目标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号