首页> 外文期刊>Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory >‘Recognition’ and ‘interest’: a multidimensional concept in the sociology of work
【24h】

‘Recognition’ and ‘interest’: a multidimensional concept in the sociology of work

机译:“认可”和“兴趣”:工作社会学中的多维概念

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

For decades, the German sociology of work had been dominated by a Marxism-inspired paradigm of interest. More recently, however, a paradigm of identity and recognition has gained prominence. This change is closely linked to a shift in the socio-theoretical, socio-political, and normative discourse as well as to a shift in labor relations, where identity, subjectivity, and recognition claims have become more important. The paradigm of recognition meets the requirements of these changes better than the old concept of interest. At the same time, however, the use of the concept of interest has become increasingly vague and has lost much of its explanatory power. Against this backdrop, the article argues for a multidimensional reconceptualization of ‘interest’ and ‘recognition’, which is necessary in order to save the concept of recognition from becoming a catch-all category. Based on the recognition theory of Axel Honneth and the contributions of Heinrich Popitz and Pierre Bourdieu, ‘interest’ is being conceptualized as a reflective form of a preference that makes actions calculable. The category of ‘interest identity’ will have a mediating role, conceived as the structure of those interests actors identify with as essential for their identity. The article argues for a concept of ‘recognition’ and ‘interest’ as complementary categories. Actors pursue an interest, and in doing so they seek recognition. But there can be a discrepancy of these action logics, too, which can lead to trade-offs between ‘recognition’ and ‘interest’. Moreover, ‘recognition’ and ‘interest’ can provide two distinct scripts for the articulation of concerns, disappointments, and conflicts among actors.View full textDownload full textKeywordsaction theory, Honneth, identity, interest, recognition, script, sociology of workRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2012.640594
机译:几十年来,德国的工作社会学一直受到马克思主义启发的兴趣范式的支配。然而,近来,身份和认可的范式日益突出。这种变化与社会理论,社会政治和规范话语的转变以及劳动关系的转变紧密相关,在劳动关系中,身份,主观性和认可主张变得更加重要。识别范式比旧的兴趣概念更好地满足了这些更改的要求。但是,与此同时,利息概念的使用变得越来越模糊,失去了很多解释力。在这种背景下,本文主张对“兴趣”和“识别”进行多维重新概念化,这对于避免将识别概念转变为万能的类别是必要的。基于Axel Honneth的识别理论以及Heinrich Popitz和Pierre Bourdieu的贡献,“兴趣”被概念化为一种偏好的反映形式,使行动可以计算。 “利益认同”这一类别将起中介作用,被认为是行为者认同的那些利益结构对其身份至关重要。本文主张将“识别”和“兴趣”作为互补类别的概念。演员追求一种兴趣,并因此而寻求认可。但是,这些动作逻辑也可能存在差异,这可能导致在“识别”与“兴趣”之间进行权衡。此外,“认可”和“兴趣”可以提供两个不同的脚本来表达参与者之间的关注点,失望和冲突。查看全文下载全文关键字动作理论,霍内斯,身份,兴趣,认可,脚本,工作社会学相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”} ;添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2012.640594

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号