首页> 外文期刊>Diplomacy & Statecraft >“Only the USSR Has… Clean Hands”: The Soviet Perspective on the Failure of Collective Security and the Collapse of Czechoslovakia, 1934-1938 (Part 2)
【24h】

“Only the USSR Has… Clean Hands”: The Soviet Perspective on the Failure of Collective Security and the Collapse of Czechoslovakia, 1934-1938 (Part 2)

机译:“只有苏联才能拥有干净的双手”:苏联对集体安全失败和捷克斯洛伐克崩溃的看法,1934-1938年(第二部分)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The second part of this two part essay focuses on the Czechoslovak crisis in 1938, based on papers from the Arkhiv vneshnei politiki Rossiiskoi Federatsii in Moscow and the recently published journals of Soviet ambassador in London, Ivan M. Maiskii. The essay is also grounded in British, French, and Romanian archives, and the standard document collections, including the American and German series. The Soviet Union did all that it could do, given Anglo-French abdication, to help the Czechoslovak goverment defend its independance against Nazi Germany. The British and French portrayed a manipulative Soviet Union, seeking to abandon treaty commitments to Czechoslovakia, while at the same time they fled from obligations to Prague and projected their own evasions onto Moscow. In spite of everything, the Czechoslovak president, Edvard Beneš, might have held the fate of his country in his own hands. Would he do “something crazy”, would Czechoslovakia fight alone at the outset, hoping that public opinion would force France and Great Britain into war? Tragically, Beneš would not bid va banque and indeed was complicit in the Anglo-French abandonment of his country. By its reckoning, the Soviet Union escaped the crisis with “clean hands”, though a clear conscience was no consolation in Moscow, where the government had to contemplate the ruin of collective security and its own isolation in Europe.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09592296.2010.508402
机译:这两部分的第二部分重点介绍1938年的捷克斯洛伐克危机,其依据是莫斯科的Arkhiv vneshnei politiki Rossiiskoi Federatsii的论文以及最近在伦敦发表的苏联大使的期刊Ivan M. Maiskii。这篇文章还以英国,法国和罗马尼亚的档案资料以及包括美国和德国系列在内的标准文献资料为基础。在英法退位的情况下,苏联竭尽全力帮助捷克斯洛伐克政府捍卫其对纳粹德国的独立性。英法描绘了操纵苏联的行为,试图放弃对捷克斯洛伐克的条约承诺,与此同时,他们逃避了对布拉格的义务,并将自己的逃避投射到了莫斯科。尽管如此,捷克斯洛伐克总统爱德华·贝内奥(EdvardBeneÅ¡)可能掌握了自己国家的命运。他会做“某种疯狂的事情”,捷克斯洛伐克一开始会否独自作战,希望舆论能迫使法国和英国参战?悲剧的是,贝内奥(BeneÅ¡)不会参加va banque,确实是他的国家被英法遗弃的同谋。据估计,苏联以``干净利落的双手''摆脱了危机,尽管在莫斯科,明显的良心绝非安慰,政府不得不在欧洲沉思集体安全的破坏和自身的孤立。查看全文下载全文相关变量var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09592296.2010.508402

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号